This system involves lay jurors who participate in joint debate with other professional judges so as to come up with the sentence and capability of the criminal defendants in the severe cases of criminal activities. Traditionally, the modern Japanese Judiciary has been regarded by the academia and public as being insulated from elitist, public and unfriendly to criminal defendants who normally face a higher than ninety nine percent conviction Schmalleger (2012). This is normally due to the intense prosecutorial proceeding coupled with the high rate of pretrial confessions. However, the mixed jury system is normally designed to democratize the criminal legal process. This method or rather system aims at eliminating the domination of the judicial system on the cases by using their influence to pressure the lay people into accepting the court’s opinions. This system is also designed in a way so as to maintain predictable and consistent decisions on the sentences and verdicts and making sure that those decisions reflect and are not entirely determined by the Justice of the Supreme Court Linnan (2012). This system also looks at improving the jury system and providing a good opportunity for laypersons to participate in the decisions of the court meaningfully without sacrificing or rather affecting the predictability, elite notions of justice and consistency. It also looks at trying to allow justice officials to pursue policies which are focused on rehabilitating the offenders Tanenhaus (2008). . This project looks to focus on whether this system has encouraged a more democratic system within the Court system by promoting fairer trials and better justice system compared to the US. However, there have been a number of people who have been defending the traditional system on different grounds. They argue that the Japanese Judicial system is one of the most sophisticated and consistent in the whole world Kaplan and Martil (2006). They further ague that the Judges in this system are esteemed, politically independent, professional and honest compared to those in other countries. The high conviction rate in Japan is praised and advocated for on grounds that only the guilty defendants are convicted. Regardless of all these views, it goes without doubt that a fairer judicial system was needed. The saiban-in system adopted from the west has brought a fair trial to the defendants. It is very important to note that the modern lay jury system does not resemble that of the US despite the fact that it has borrowed a lot from there. The three main pillars of the Justice system in Japan have come out strongly in support of this new system. The three pillars are the Supreme Court, the Department of justice and the Japanese Federal of Bar Associations. They have actively publicized this new system to the citizens by employing all the possible advertising platforms. The main question at hand is whether this new system has brought fairer trials in Japan and whether it has been more effective than in the US. Comparing these two systems and the modifications that have been put in place, we will be able to come up with a clear answer of the same. In the United States for example, this system is being undermined on grounds that it gives the lay judges too much power that influence the decision of the court. This is because the community representative has grown to be a
Cite this document
(“The Japanese Mixed Jury System: Saiban-in Seido (Introduction & Term Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/sociology/105582-the-japanese-mixed-jury-system-saiban-in-seido
(The Japanese Mixed Jury System: Saiban-in Seido (Introduction & Term Paper)
“The Japanese Mixed Jury System: Saiban-in Seido (Introduction & Term Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/sociology/105582-the-japanese-mixed-jury-system-saiban-in-seido.
Cited: 0 times
Running head: THE JAPANESE MIXED JURY SYSTEM THE JAPANESE MIXED JURY SYSTEM: SAIBAN-IN SEIDO Japan has been observed to be adopting and borrowing the western customs and incorporating them to its own social and traditional traditions…
Childhood obesity increases the risk of overweight adults with related chronic diseases. Literature Review Physiological factors Grant et al. (2009) have talked about the replicated association between obesity and the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP).
Scientific jury selection involves the specific use of specific social science techniques in order to get the best favorable jurists for a particular trial. It has been observed in many trials, many factors affect the way the judges and jurists look at the accused.
Nasr writes from the traditional Islam perspective, and he opposes secular modernist or fundamentalist perspectives, both of which he sees as extremist forms of Islam. He concludes that Islam will rarely change in the future, because doctrinal and practical orthodoxy that rests on one underlying belief- complete submission to Allah.
Literature Review (Modern and Classic) In Ragtime, Doctorow makes reference to recognizable historical figures and events. However, he changes certain details that entirely fabricate the real circumstances. The novel takes on a building block of fantasy as well as addressing the subjectivity of these historical moments.
This is referred to as universal grammar. The nativist approach suggests that universal grammar is the basis upon which languages spoken by human beings are built. This topic is essential in the study of languages because it illustrates the ease with which people tend to master their mother tongues, as opposed to other languages.
The progression of the Japan and American jury systems has progressed differently owing to the differences in the structure and history of the two countries. Here considers differences of The Japanese Quasi-Jury Vs the American Jury.
In fact, it was necessary to go to college and obtain a degree. The best jobs went to those who held a degree. Hence, there was no question about attending college. It had to be done. But I was not particularly looking forward to a life in college. If anything, I dreaded it.
SPC uses certain analytical tools and allows the investigator to see whether the process is working correctly as intended or not.
By applying SPC one can maintain certain standards of a process in absence of any inspection or regulation of every each and
This is why many hospitality industries develop franchise opportunities so that corporate headquarters does not have to be concerned with local customs and cultures while still maintaining a manageable operating budget.
And for the employer, employee’s performance is critical as this performance appraisal enables the employer to determine the reward for the employee. In other words, this reward and performance has become a relationship between the employer and the employee in which both
4 pages (1000 words)Term Paper
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Term Paper on topic The Japanese Mixed Jury System: Saiban-in Seido (Introduction & Literature Review) for FREE!