The signature depicts a sense of similarity and with the training obtained by the investigators; they are fast at telling that the crime originates from a single perpetrator. The members of public are desperate for help. The public members have indisputable confidence in the investigator and view the investigator as their savior. By extension, the members of the public have a feeling that in case they motivate the investigator then they would have facilitated the process of investigation and the apprehension of criminal. A cup of coffee or a couple of cups would not act as any form of bribery since they are considered quite cheap and this would not have any merit in such assumptions. I am simply steadfast at explaining this in the first place to quell any sense of thought on bribery to the investigating officer to the public (Breton, 2012). Remember, no one can engage with the investigating officer to the extent of buying a cup of coffee without sharing any form if information. In any investigation, information especially from the public is considered critical in any nature since if used well, can provide leads to the origin of crime and possibly to the perpetrator. However, no fact should be assumed and further more with the fact that this is a criminal situation and anything can happen to the investigator. In case the investigator is the target of the criminal then there should be restriction in the interaction with the public (Stevens, 2010). It is rational to think that the perpetrator of crimes would lure the investigator through any means and possibly through the public to understand the motives and movements. In such a situation, the investigation process would become more complicated. In as much as retrieving the information from the public being vital, extreme care is fundamental because criminals are fond of performing extremely outrageous and least expected acts and would not care of the social status of the investigating officer. This implies that any act can result to impede the investigation process. Accepting the cups coffee from the public as a police investigator is not a bad idea neither does it tint reputation in any significant manner. The act incorporates a series of advantages in the investigation process. It shows unity in the society and tends to close any societal gaps based on the social status and professionalism. One can understand the society considerably fast and get to know the course to take with the investigation process. Nonetheless, there must be an understanding that it has a disadvantage that waters down all the benefits it might associate. Interacting with the public to the extent of accepting gifts would amount intensified pressure on the officer and interfere with the sequence of investigations since a greater part of the community is impatient and would like to know the criminal irrespective of whether the information is right or wrong. This would prompt the investigator to arrest people without enough proof to satisfy the public. The investigating officer is in an immense danger and this would impede the whole investigation process in a disastrous manner. Therefore, accepting coffee from the public is NOT a good idea and the officer should not involve in such an act. Investigations require proper mental status. Any instability in the intellectual capacity would lead to compromise in the process. One has to be collected and sober in the mind for perfect execution of the investigative activity. Therefore,
Cite this document
(“Ethics and Criminal Justice: A Case Analysis Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/sociology/113788-ethics-and-criminal-justice-a-case-analysis
(Ethics and Criminal Justice: A Case Analysis Essay)
“Ethics and Criminal Justice: A Case Analysis Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/sociology/113788-ethics-and-criminal-justice-a-case-analysis.
Cited: 0 times
Ethics and Criminal Justice: A Case Analysis Name Institution Ethics and Criminal Justice: A Case Analysis In this case there are in place facts concerning the case and any attempt to incline the facts would jeopardize the overall handling of the situation…
CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM OF AUSTRALIA.
“When all is said and done, the current criminal justice system is about as fair and effective as we can reasonably expect” Every society has its own criminal justice system. Such justice system seeks to manage the peace and order in any society, ensuring that all its citizens are protected from harmful elements and that the appropriate due processes are available for parties in the redress of criminal grievances.
However, when an organization’s primary objective is to enforce a code of law, such as the criminal justice system, ethical outcomes are equivalent to efficient outcomes (Banks, 2008). In that sense, ethics in criminal justice is very important and should be the consideration of every person operating within that context.
However, it is equally hard to establish her innocence given that she has a criminal record of being in possession of drugs and using them. She is also on record for her children who were taken by the system when she was a drug addict. This case also presents an ethical dilemma to Shantel herself; she has to choose between bargaining a plea and keeping her child or forfeiting the plea bargain and losing her child to the system.
External forces, political and social, should not be allowed to interfere with the judicial system. If so, the rich and mighty in the society will be able to influence the outcome of certain cases in their favor. According to the U.S. constitution, the prosecutor has virtually un-reviewable power to charge and should exercise it in utmost discretion.
217). This means that a professional behavior in the administration of criminal justice is having direct association with the law and its guidelines. Thus, a defense lawyer for instance, for as long as he adheres to the law is doing the right thing particularly if he tries to defend a culprit of the crime.
Therefore, ethics in criminal justice is a very imperative aspect in the provision of or exemption from punishment for crimes.
In this scenario, according to me, being dutiful is the most important quality one needs to possess, as a justice personnel.
This assertion, however, raises a host of questions. For instance, if American soldiers operating in other countries had been conscious of the ethics of duty, they would have realized that they could discharge their duties without prejudice to ethical norms which they clearly violated through merciless treatment even of those not pronounced guilty of all the crimes laid at their doors; and if they had been aware of the ethics of use, they would have exhibited restraint in the use of force where it was not called for.
Consequently, the police car crashed onto another vehicle and caused the death of the other driver. The rookie officer faced an ethical dilemma after a lawsuit has been filed against the senior officer and an inquiry has been initiated (Schafer 2002). These events are recounted by John Schafer (2002) in his article 'Making Ethical Decisions: A practical model for police personnel' in which the author likewise discusses our basis and sources of ethical codes and guidelines.
This difference is masked by ideology where people are led to believe that the criminal justice system is actually functional and working to perfection and in favour of humanity while in the real sense it is not. It has no
3 pages (750 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Ethics and Criminal Justice: A Case Analysis for FREE!