However, cyber bullying is mostly associated with causation of harmful emotional fallout which may cumulate to other gar reaching consequences. Hopeline cites an example of Megan Meier; the girl aged 13 who committed suicide after belittlement by a hacker (her mother’s friend) that posed on MySpace as a boy aged 16 years. Hopline acknowledges that peer to peer cyber bullying is the most rampant, but its implications are not so severe. Effective curbing of cyber bullying would entail instilling of ethical morals among the youth, which will help them suit to information technologies. Hopline argues that there can be no an over-reactive approach as parents barring their kids from accessing technology in attempt to curb cyber bullying. Hopline suggests that an appropriate ramification procedure would entail the parents convening to open meetings, where then the parents can share and appropriately advice their kids on cyber bullying. Parents should be tactical so to dispel rebellion from their kids. Parents should not ignore the fact that all have under high risks of cyber bullying; terms such as ‘some kids are immune’ should not exist since all are sensitive to belittlement. Other intervention techniques should encompass teaching the kids on the importance of respect. In the case where kids are cyber-bullied, appropriate intervention procedures should be followed before the situation gets out of hand.
It is factual that kids are major victims of cyber bullying. It is also true that cyber bullying is so rampant that it has extended into kids’ classroom....
Other intervention techniques should encompass teaching the kids on the importance of respect. In the case where kids are cyber-bullied, appropriate intervention procedures should be followed before the situation gets out of hand. It is factual that kids are major victims of cyber bullying. It is also true that cyber bullying is so rampant that it has extended into kids’ classroom. The proposed techniques are also appropriate, but to limited extend. However, Hopline misses out a point in assuming that moral deviance among kids is to blame for rampant cyber bullying. Hopline forgets that adults (such as the Megan Meier’s hacker) are part of cyber-bullies. Due to this, Hopline also misses out a point in laying emphasis on the need for parents to be outgoing in advising their kids. How could this connected with addressing adult-to-kid cyber bullying? Hopline should have gone extra mile to address adult-to-kid cyber bullying, if only cyber-bullying is to be curbed. Scarfone and Mell propose the use of Network Intrusion and Detection System (NIDS) in curbing cyber crimes (Scarfone 77). NIDS refers to a system designed to detect suspect or malicious activities. This is achieved via Network Security Monitoring (NSM). Scarfone and Mell insist that the importance of NIDS to security sensitive organization cannot be overemphasized. They cite that organizations should prefer the use of NIDS to other Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS). This is because it does not only impact greatly on the network security, but it is cheaper and takes short time to deploy. Taking of short time to deploy averts maximum damage of the intrusion. Furthermore, it has a potential of effectively monitoring all internet traffic, immediately relaying