Populism, Progressivism, and the New Deal rested on a common assumption, namely, that one could wring a higher standard of living out of the Industrial Revolution for all the people within the framework of constitutional government and capitalism. Because the radical left denied that assumption, it does not belong to the progressive tradition…
The Populists, failing to understand that their problems derived from a world-wide agricultural depression, projected their grievances on aliens: on Easterners, Wall Street, English capitalists, and Jewish bankers who were allied in a conspiracy, according to the Populist philosophy of history, to destroy the liberty-loving, Anglo-Saxon husbandmen. This notion stemmed from self-deception. Instead of accepting himself for the agricultural capitalist he was, the Populist imagined himself to be the mythical yeoman who had been celebrated since Jefferson's day as the unspoiled child of Nature and the worthiest of all Americans.
Populists had identified three broad areas of economic discontent in the pre-political as well as political phases of their protest: the familiar Populist trinity of demands contained in the Omaha Platform of 1892--transportation, money, and land. These demands conveniently define the genesis of the movement's protest, particularly because they were critical to what Populists viewed as a forcible process of modernization that sacrificed agriculture to the presumed imperatives of a rationalized industrial order. Their cumulative effect was greater than the sum of their separate consequences, and this led Populists to generalize specific economic grievances in their political analysis and indictment of a system that resulted in the loss of human liberties. Populists protested against the extension of the mechanisms of power of an advanced capitalist economy into the more settled institutions of the countryside. The agrarian economy was also capitalistic, but it was unable to counter the superior industrial, financial, and commercial pressures that fostered a closed market in agriculture and made the conditions of farming onerous. The burden of conducting agricultural operations, and perhaps even of maintaining a particular way of life (not necessarily pastoral, but founded on the aspiration for, or in many cases the reality of, economic and political independence), motivated Populists to enlarge the basis of their criticism. They were not only agrarians who confronted the industrial structure, but they were also political democrats who sought the realization of constitutional principles. These principles were applicable to both industry and agriculture, and they would confirm the sovereignty of government, acting on behalf of the people, over the total modern economy. If capitalism was to have a moral basis, its political foundations must sustain equitable social and economic relations: The people's welfare must become the standard of public authority. That alone would reduce the power of consolidated wealth and preserve a democratic social order.
Populists accordingly maintained that a well-ordered polity was necessary to the protection of property; only in such a political framework could the standard of public interest be raised to ward off threats, which they perceived to originate in a monopolistic system, to personal holdings and the fair remuneration of labor. "Usurpation" and related terms connoted the illegal seizure of property and labor-created value by corporate enterprise. This expropriation of the lesser capitalist and laborer signified the breakdown of the legitimate authority that alone was capable of enforcing general-welfare principles in the regulation of society.
Populists frequently did not ...
Cite this document
(“Populist and Progressive Movements Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/sociology/283192-populist-and-progressive-movements
(Populist and Progressive Movements Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Populist and Progressive Movements Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/sociology/283192-populist-and-progressive-movements.
Progressivism was the outcome of a number of forces in American life. The reform spirit of the 1880's and 1890's was still strong, despite the collapse of the Populist Party after the election of 1896. After the hard times of the 1890's, many Americans were anxious for a better life and supported reforms intended to achieve this.
The general sentiment was that the earlier educational paradigms and the theoretical precepts which informed them, neither valued the child as a mind or a body, nor gave him the tools requisite for mental and intellectual development. Through an historical overview of the events and philosophies of the Progressive Era, this essay will present the face of the period's schools and the philosophy of education which shaped both them and the curricula they adopted.
The phenomenon of populism embraced multi-class foundations, the strengthening of the role of the State in socio-economic affairs, the goal of integrating marginal issues into the political process to aid in the equal distribution of resources, and the rehabilitation of popular culture (Conniff, 1999).
The progressive movement was based on the concepts of social justice, greater efficiency in government and social control. This movement was basically consisting of the middle-class people and urban professionals. The people thought that the government should become more active regarding democratic reforms and in protecting laborers.
cluding the U.K, have adopted statutes that required the special provisions for offenders which include psychotherapy as part of their sentence as monitoring and notification of the physical movement of offenders (Shoham, 2001). Based on the U.K’s Sex Offenders Act 1997,
One of the leaders that are creating an alternative voice for the marginalized population is Glenn Beck. Beck is known for his political rhetoric that is presented through radio, media and TV programs. The statements that are made
American nation drifting into the arms of a progressive movement that was set to leave its impacts in social, political, economic and religious quarters. Generally the Progressive Era is seen to begin in the 1890’s and last into the 1920’s. (Buenker, Burnham, & Crunden,
attitudes toward the proper role of administration were altering from the restricted responsibility favored in the 19th century to the ever more expanding role selected in the 20th century. It majorly emphasized on fiscal and political restructuring movements. The economic
The progressive era lasted approximately 40 years from 1879-1920.
Religion and social inequality were issues part of the progressive era. These bound to affect any society. Religion and social movements played a great role in the transformation of America
Progressive era is the period of political as well as social reforms in US between 1890s and 1920s. Establishing the direct democracy was an important goal of this era. Progressivism is seen as the international movement for rapid growth in the urbanization and urban areas. Progressivism brought several improvements in social, political and economic developments.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Populist and Progressive Movements for FREE!