The French Republic makes the stipulation that, French people are those who are in possession of French nationality. And in accordance with the French constitutional council, the constitution recognizes none other than the French people, composed of all its citizens making no distinction of race, ethnic origin or religion”(FCC) Official French statistics do not keep record of its citizens who are foreign born. Under French law it is not practiced nor is it encouraged to make reference or record the ethnic origin of persons.The French government has adopted ( indications suggest that the policy has persisted in France since the French revolution), a policy stresses French identity and this identity has its premise in the notion of citizenship rather than on cultural or ethnic origins.The French do not place any credence in the phrase “French ethnic group”. As a matter of fact the phrase is very highly disputed among Frenchmen who project the argument that the composition is a nationality and a citizenship.According to Greta Gilbertson in her article, Citizenship in a Globalize World”, “citizenship is a multidimensional concept that means membership in a specific nation-state and the formal rights and obligations that this membership entails. Citizenship can also be understood as a status and an identity. The principal premise of citizenship is that nation-states can set and control the perimeters of membership”(Gilbertson 2006) Subsequent to the French revolution, France was shadowed as the humanistic ‘teacher of mankind’. ...
as the one party regime, the major problem with its precepts is that it has a heavy bias in
favor of the power elite. The concepts and practices of universalization do not trickle
down to the entire population. Universality is not an egalitarian concept, practice or
policy, when being applied to a nation-state. Universality belies its meaning when one
applies it to the French experience. In the words of Todorov, "universality can not
democratically respect the entire population as it claims to do. Hence universality
translates into a false ideology of inclusion, yet it is a part of the hegemonic imposition of
French ideals"(Todorov, 1994).
When we isolate assimilation, the concept of universality and equality, becomes
blurred as it relates to integration, nonetheless in reality is exclusionary. The French
politicalization of whiteness and race can be quite distasteful. According to T. S. Juge'
and M. P. Perez, in their piece, The Modern Colonia Politics of Citizenship and whiteness
in France, "the French/foreigner binary takes place in the universal definition of French
citizenship. People of colour who do not fit the 'special' characteristics required to
become French find themselves in the foreign category"(Juge', Perez) Thus, the inclusive
definition of universality translates into a new form of exclusion for third-world non-
European populations"(Juge' Perez)
As a matter of due course in France, in order to fully perpetuate ethnoculturism
there must be a strong push toward oppression and the absence of minority groups. This
does not only apply to the absence of minority groups in politics and the economy, but a
concerted suppression of their concept of identity, furthering their