Sports, just like other characteristics of a society, are shaped or determined through the economic system’s structure in the society. Sports form a central part in people’s lives, it’s linked to major social institutions and it influences culture. According to Hagger and Chatzisarantis, “violence in a sports context, is connected to underlying social political and economic grievances held by the working class elements of the crowd. Therefore sports context in which fans share these common resentments serve as a hotbed for the expression of aggression directed at the perceived perpetrators of the inequities (210).” Hagger and Chatzisarantis quoting Levin and Vinten-Johansen 1981, asserts that “sports is an ideal conduit for the expression of dissent through aggression because elements of modern professional sports are perceived as economically exploitative of the ‘average’ working-class fan.” Perceive social and economic injustices can, therefore, use to explain the collective aggression. Conflicting theory in sports suggests that aggression is the manifestation of injustice and grievances experienced by the particular working-class constituents in the sports crowds plus the effort to show deviance, restore the balance and dissent. Conflicting theory in sports involves applying the principles of conflict theory to explain deviance in sports and structural causes by paying attention to the structural circumstances of commodification and massification.
Conflict theory in sports takes a keen look at “Who makes it” by keenly observing inequality. Whilst numerous persons strive for success in athletic career, boys and/or girls might be under excessive pressure to excel so as to move from poverty in the ghetto. Athletes are no socially valued yet they make a lot of money owing to commercialism that encompass sports today. University and corporate interests exploit athletes making them ‘commodities’ and probably alienating the sport they were participating in. sports is a lucrative business and college players get exploited by their universities or colleges which award them with scholarships and retains the bigger share from their talents. As such players get used whilst little is invested in their education. Thus conflict theory in sport makes it clear that inequality in sports can’t be curtailed unless changes initially occur to lessen our commercial culture and lower wide income inequalities (Messner, 71-88).
The article includes a literature review on aggression as a subject and the function of athletics amongst the Hispanic residents. It notes that the concept of ‘machismo’ implying aggressiveness has been associated with Hispanic males and means that there is high probability amongst Hispanics as compared to athletes from some other ethnic grouping. The article makes it clear the fact that aggression is unsurpassedely predicted by social-economic status (SES) as opposed to ethnicity. A family environment which is supportive has been established to offer a protective aspect against aggression. Athletics is seen to provide this kind of environment plus the fact that it allows for a suitable expression venue for the aggressive behavior.
The field of athletics has in the last twenty years drawn a sizeable quantity of attention. Currently sports are well thought-out as superlative equalizer because significant attention is accorded to the ability of athlete’s with lesser attention being given to their specific ethnic origin. Despite the overwhelming