As may be deduced from the foregoing, there are three primary stakeholders here. These are the smokers, society at large and importantly, the tobacco industry. A secondary stakeholder is the hospitality industry. Smoke-free legislature means that smoking will be prohibited in nightclubs, bars, restaurants, hotels and places of entertainment in general. Within the context of the stated, it may be assumed that both the tobacco and the hospitality industry will not support such a legislature but, given the proven outcomes of smoking, will not publicly oppose it either.
Drug laws, as this article indicates, are ineffective as a deterrent to drug use. This is evidenced in the fact that the former West Coast Eagles star recently died from a drug overdose. The death of Mainwright, in itself, is not the issue as much as is the failure of drug laws to eliminate the problem of drug use. A consideration of the fact that the primary stakeholder in this is society itself highlights both the complexity and the seriousness of this problem. Society is simultaneously the drug user and the victim. Members therein use drugs and the effect of their addiction is not confined to their own selves but expands to include society which is subsequently vulnerable to an entire array of crimes which are motivated by drug-use.
A critical consideration of the above leads to two conclusions. The first is that drug laws have proven an ineffective deterrent and the second is that the current drug laws need to be overhauled and include stricter punitive measures for drug users and sellers. The hospitality industry has a pivotal role to play in the war on drugs and the enforcement of drug policies. This is because their premises, especially nightclubs, are often exploited as a venue for selling and using. The industry needs to be more vigilant and the law should compel them to be so through their penalisation, including revocation of licenses, if their premises are regularly used for such activities.
Anon (2007, 20 Oct.) Workplace ads backfire: Survey. Sydney Morning Herald.
Employment laws and legislature are designed to outline the rights and responsibilities of both employees and employers. Needless to say, the relationship between these two stakeholder groups sometimes tends towards the contentious and as a means for re-adjusting the relationship and maximising the possibilities of harmonious cooperation, laws are readjusted, if not completely overhauled and redesigned. Readjustment of employment laws, practices and policies is, in itself, a positive strategy insofar as it determines to ensure that the stated remain relevant to the ever-changing external politico-economic environment.
Even though legislative readjustments are often required, that does not mean that they do not meet with resistance from the two stakeholders. Recent readjustments, despite government ads