We would subsequently move onto a very important debate of two very important writers from the field of sociology: Karl Marx and mile Durkheim and their conflicting analysis on society and the state. After we have clearly explained their stances on the matter, we will try to use Weber's theory of ideal type and try and establish its implication on the debate between Marx and Durkhiem and see whether the concept of ideal type can better help explain the concept at hand.
With this structure in mind, let us move onto the concept of the ideal type, as proposed by Max Weber. Basically, an ideal type is the formulation of a systematic build, which put in extremely simple terms, acts as an assessment implement for a researcher who wishes to determine the similarities and difference between the concrete conceptual arguments. Suffice to say, many who are related to the field of sociology consider this to be an ideal construct for comparative study. "An ideal type is formed by the one-sided accentuation of one or more points of view and by the synthesis of a great many diffuse, discrete, more or less present and occasionally absent concrete individual phenomena, which are arranged according to those one-sidedly emphasized viewpoints into a unified analytical construct." 
An ideal type is not merely a reference to moral ideals. One can even have ideal types of prostitutes or pre-marital sex; and neither were Weber's intentions whilst instituting this theory statistical and mathematical compliance. For a very simple example, the average Muslim in a given country at a given period in history the exact model of an ideal Muslim. So fundamentally, the ideal type is merely an inflection of the emblematic courses of conduct that one would witness in a certain genre of the society. Due to this, many of the ideal types that have been instituted by Weber are not based on the social activities and niceties of individuals; rather they are based on the collectivities of these said individuals, however, it is important to note that social relationships between these said collectivities stand upon the implicit probability that the component actors of the collectives would conduct themselves in accordance with acceptable social norms and regulations. Another important aspect of the theory of the ideal type is that the ideal type of a certain figure from sociology does not directly correlate with the concrete sensory-perceptional reality in fact it always deviates at least one marginal step away from this reality. This ideal type is constructed from some sections of reality in order to form a logically precise and coherent whole, which can never be located or created in the said reality on its own. An example to better explain this rather peculiar statement is that there is never an empirical example of the best Muslim, the most charismatic leader or the ethics and values of prostitution. 
Ideal types allow a sociologist to build hypothesis which link them to the circumstances that were responsible for bringing the concept into full view in the first place, or with the consequences that follow from the emergence of the said concepts.
If we wish to study the religious roots of modern capitalism, it may be advisable to construct an ideal type of Protestant, based on the distinct features of sectarians as these emerged during the Reformation. We shall then be in a position to determine empirically whether the concrete conduct of Protestants in, say, seventeenth-century England did in fact approximate the type and in what specific aspects it