Although it can be noted that both articles are similar with regard to the fact that both refer to the historical, economic, social and psychological factors in order to support the statements made, there are several distinctive arguments used as the basis in each of the papers.
Fox hunting in England dates back to the late 17th century starts with the historical introduction and the description of the traditional hunt. Then brief list of the major arguments shared by the ban opponents is given: importance of the traditional fox hunting as an "integral part of the rural community", negative potential impact of the ban on the hunt-related jobs, role of hunts in managing the population of the foxes in the region, and, last but not least, the harm foxes cause to the crops, trees, poultry, and animals.
The last part of the article deals with the legislative processing of the ban and future forecasts. The author voices an opinion that the century-old tradition will not be fully abandoned as a result. The reference to the BBC News and League Against Cruel Sports (LACS) is made, when pinpointing that the threat of ban did not really alter the business of English hunts, and several cases of illegal operations were reported.
After description of the article structure, I want to concentrate on its historical focus while considering it the most distinctive part of the article. Such an approach is characteristic for other supporters of the position "fox hunting is an ancient and valid tradition".
The author brings attention of the audience to the fact that fox hunting has developed and spread throughout the country as early as in the late seventeenth century. It has replaced partly deer hunting which was very popular before. The article depicts fox hunting as a sport activity of monarchs and noblemen. The description of the hunt's "hierarchy", traditional outfit and established procedures puts an emphasis on the fact that hunting with hounds for foxes is a long-lived national tradition with its strict rules and beautiful accessories.
This approach shifts the attention from the fox, an object of the hunt, and its suffering to the followers and procedures they follow. It is not uncommon for the supporters of the fox hunt. The illustration to the article, a fox hunt colourful painting, portrays energetic hounds and beautiful looking hunters in traditional scarlet, white and black outfit. However, the fox being followed by the hounds and the hunters on the horses is not on the picture. A scared, tired from running animal would bring a dissonance into this merry picture of the prestigious entertainment.
On the contrary, the argument of the animals' suffering is widely deployed by the supporters of the complete ban on the fox hunting. The article Fox hunting: Why this Evil should be banned devotes a lot of attention to the issue of fox's suffering as a result of the long tiresome pursuit and painful death. Although the article touches upon many other arguments, its crux is within the topic of cruelty. The