There were a lot of discussions and debates regarding the use of nuclear weapons against any enemy nation. Some politicians were of the opinion that the Japanese were ready to quit the war without using atomic bombs, because more than 60 of its cities had been destroyed by conventional bombing. Some of them also thought that Japan would never surrender, because the Japanese had demonstrated near-fanatical resistance, fighting to almost the last man on the Pacific islands, committing mass suicide on Saipan and unleashing kamikaze attacks at Okinawa. I think that President Truman had taken the right decision which helped the US to finish this war much earlier and without enormous casualties on both sides. Given below are some factual support points which explain why we should drop the atomic bomb on Japan: Harry S. Truman and other officials claimed that the bombs would help them to avoid a bloody invasion, and also would help US to make the Soviet Union “more manageable”.
Cite this document
(“Why We Had to Drop the Atomic Bomb Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/sociology/357367-why-we-had-to-drop-the-atomic-bomb
(Why We Had to Drop the Atomic Bomb Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“Why We Had to Drop the Atomic Bomb Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/sociology/357367-why-we-had-to-drop-the-atomic-bomb.
Cited: 0 times
The President of the United States Harry S. Truman had taken a decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan during the World War II. Therefore, on the 6th and 9th of August, the atomic bombs were dropped. …
This act introduced new questions and conceptions concerning how wars might be waged in the future and calling into question whether or not humanity would survive very far into the future and has initiated a global debate regarding if those actions was truly necessary.
Mentioned in the article is that fact that the decision to use a major weapon, such as the Atomic Bomb, have largely been left up to the government, specifically the legislative body. As a result of the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, however, the public is increasingly becoming involved in the debate.
The decision to use the A-bomb was Truman's alone and Truman never retreated from his stance that the bomb prevented an invasion and saved untold American lives. Truman, however, had other less deadly options. President Harry Truman's decision to use the atomic bomb was a reactionary decision made against military advice, and was reached made more to satisfy political pressures and dominate the coming Cold War than to bring a sudden end to the war.
Truman's conversations about the bomb were not about society's expectations, but rather on the post conventional thought that dealt with "...the effects of the use of the bomb, not [...] whether it ought to be used".1 The decision to use atomic bombs against Japan was influenced by several factors that are relevant to Kohlberg's stage 5 on the moral development scale.
Questions regarding the bombings are multifaceted. Was the use of an atomic bomb the only alternative to secure the surrender of Japan or could the U.S. have allowed the one concession Japan requested, to retain its emperor as
Walker (2008, p. 1) points towards the fact that even without the use of atomic bombs, the number of deaths and casualties would not have been much less. For example, American citizens and soldiers were fed up with the four-year long war but the Japanese leadership was
The death toll counts more than 200 thousands of civilian, and even an approximately unknown number of mutilated bodies and destinies. It can be referred to the fact that a great number of people dies every month in war time, still considering
In this study text, the above factors influenced by the post-World War II are discussed. Terrorism, which suffices as having been applied during, and after the period, is evaluated. Reasons are provided as to why it is more of malum in se than it is malum prohibitum.
In addition, it argues on the Second World War attacks and if they were acts of terrorism. Moreover, whether justifiable terrorism exists and Latin phrases that relate to terrorism. Lastly, it talks about the difference in practice of war between nations and
5 pages (1250 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Why We Had to Drop the Atomic Bomb for FREE!