However, the much criticized ban that prohibited the entrance of gays in the military service, about 50 years ago, drew validity from the fact that at that time, homosexuality was recognized to be a psychological aberration and thus the military was right and logical in pursuing a policy of culling out gays from the ranks of interested applicants (Showver, 2005). Still, the most current reality is that in the 70s, both the American Psychological Association and the American Psychiatric Association deleted homosexuality from their list of recognized mental illnesses (Showver, 2005). Therefore, psychologically speaking, there does not seem to exist any reason as to why gays may not be allowed to serve in the military. The standard objections raised against gays serving in the military definitely invite validity and concern in a professional context. It is a known fact that in the military, the personnel is required to lodge and serve in close vicinity and it is considered normal to witness one's mates undressed. Hence the gays, who may find their naked colleagues sexually attractive, may hamper and jeopardize the general efficiency and effectiveness of the straight soldiers, who definitely constitute a majority. Yet, this argument may sound sexist to some, for being based on the premise that gays are generally perverted, incontinent and are devoid of any psychological and sexual restraint. In such a scenario, it gets really problematic to decide upon which side is right.