From this study it is clear that Durkheim’s works on religion are with the inclusion of his work in year 1912 by the title The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. His works were about seeking the origin of the societal religions that exist in the globe. He avoided the perspective of individualism. In the aforementioned article his argument is that religion is a matter of differentiating things which are profane and those that are sacred. Durkheim also demarcates religion from magic with the sentiments that magic is not at all religion despite the fact that it might involve sacred things. This is since it is not from a societal level, but from the individual level.This paper outlines that Max Weber, on the other hand states in his work that religion is an instrument through which economic privilege and social strata. In the society, it is through religion that the ones who have high social strata try to legitimize their life patterns. Therefore, according to Durkheim, religion is required in society especially by the high social class to legitimize the situation in the globe as well as their own patterns. Karl Marx tried a scientific point of view to religion. This view was considered as an objective one. He said very little with regards to religion in his works, though. His works on religion are just but critiques on the forms of religion. According to him, religion is just but a form of expression with focus on economic injustice and material realities.
Cite this document
(“Sociology by Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/sociology/463751-karl-marx-emile-durkheim-max-weber
(Sociology by Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber Essay)
“Sociology by Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/sociology/463751-karl-marx-emile-durkheim-max-weber.
Cited: 0 times
This discussion stresses that Karl Marx tried a scientific point of view to religion. This view was considered as an objective one. He said very little with regards to religion in his works, though. His works on religion are just but critiques on the forms of religion. …
As the report declares in the social theory point of view, he firstly defines a society as coming up with an institution that constitutes unequal power and dominion relations. Secondly, a society to him is structuring of social interactions in a social institution and again as process of converting linguistic structures into social interactions.
According to the report Kerbo defines a paradigm as a “fundamental image of the subject matter within science. It serves to define how it should be studied and what should be studied, what questions should be asked, how they should be asked, and what rules should be followed in interpreting the answers obtained.
According to the report since 1800s, capitalism within the society has gradually becoming more evident as compared to the previous times. Because of significant development in capitalism, urbanization and industrialization took place during the early part of the 19th century. The gap between the social classes of people started to widen.
The individuals are today viewed as the three principal architects of modern social science. Even as many of these individuals’ theoretical perspectives remain in use in some form, oftentimes they are incompatible with each other. This essay examines these individuals’ theoretical perspectives, specifically considering the ways they interact.
As the discussion highlights Marx does not have much on religion; thus his view is not well known to the public. He does have his opinion aired on the words he once uttered in regard to religion, “Religion is the opium of people.” Marx defines religion as an item created by man and one that is the consciousness of humans.
Racial and ethnic Discrimination
Migration of people, demographic patterns, economic perspectives, poverty levels, tribe and race relationships are all interwoven to bring out vivid picture of these urban areas. As a result, policy implementation is inaugurated to govern the people and the activities taking place in these cities.
We focus on the bureaucratization theory, social fact theory, religion, a division of labour and specialization and the capitalist theory by Marx. All these theories explain the society we live in today but they also form a basis for determining whether the scholar's work is relevant in today’s society.
No small-scale business will even thrive. Capital will therefore, be shoved into a specific area where it can be employed to wrest control on others (centralization of capital). However, a capitalist society could not be sane