Therefore, this limits the overall research result as well as its value and gives room for predisposition of the supervisor to influence students work. Compared to the past, it was believed that certain functional areas in the field of management science that uses research strategies instead of employing the full spectrum present. According to this paper, it gives an objective view of the entire research strategies employed by trying to match these strategies to various fields of specialization and to the defined plan of research outcome. The journal article was studies based on proportional stratified random sampling, research strategies and design as well as the conclusion. A model as shown by Pellissier & Rene (2010) was chosen to be used. The model was reworked using context analysis approach in combination of the modeling and building theory. The stratification allowed development of any differences between the trends and journals. From such a finding, it seems that the present review process is not very strict in all areas research methodology and design so as to show the difference that exists between articles.
The clearly paper discuses the main issues of research ethics that are qualitative in nature majorly on the case of studies that are published in the creation social science journal. The author is able to discus the qualitative research applications of different concepts such as genera-liability, reliability and validity as well as relevance of the ethical considerations in qualitative research and even going an extra mile to examine the convention of different methods that the researcher interacted with research participants. For instance in-depth interviews tend to focus on groups interviews and observation published in 2000-2011 by different Croatian journals that re indexed in the international bibliography of science (IBSS) as well as the social science citation (SSC). Based on the results, they evidence the undeveloped conventions used