The highlighted courtroom’s criminal cases in the assigned pages are informational to consumers of criminal justice information. To start with, there is more to criminal justice processes and systems than individual users of these systems actually know. Chapters 14 to 19 show that a criminal justice process is broad in scope and flexible in interpretation than it is thought to be. In this regard, pursuits into criminal justice are not necessarily fully restricted to specific practices of jury decisions. In other words, a criminal justice issue encompasses critical evaluation, analysis, and assessment of factors that affect the matter at hand (Bach 220). Therefore, it is important that any given consumer of criminal justice information understands pre and post impacts of dealing with a criminal justice issue. Addressing a criminal justice issue is a process that should be fully backed by evidence. It is, therefore, a matter of what can be proved and not necessarily what the parties bound to the issue know (Kathy & Arnold 64). This requires that the issue at hand be dealt with diligently, with accountability and transparency in order to promote fairness and justice. Users of criminal justice information have been made to understand that the jury at times finds itself fixed in a dilemma when alternative solutions to a criminal justice issue are conflicting. This and all the information provided by the assigned pages have provided a whole new and advanced perspective into the criminal justice.
Cite this document
(“Criminal Processes and the Courtroom Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/sociology/492135-i-will-write-down-the-instruction
(Criminal Processes and the Courtroom Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words)
“Criminal Processes and the Courtroom Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/sociology/492135-i-will-write-down-the-instruction.
Cited: 0 times
The purpose of this writing "Criminal processes and the Courtroom" is to examine the importance of the courtroom in the legal investigation process. The assigned pages have presented an interesting scenario of how issues to do with criminal justice are dealt with…
Unconscious Bias The article entitled “The case for behavioral strategy” written by Lovallo and Sibony (2010) and published in the McKinsey Quarterly on March 2010 focuses on the role of subconscious cognitive biases, defined as “systematic tendencies to deviate from rational calculations” (Lovallo and Sibony, 2010, par.
Cindy, the grandmother, reported that Casey Marie Anthony could not be traced for a whole month. She said that her car smelled of a dead body. On her side, Casey gave various versions of Caylee’s whereabouts to the detectives (Colarossi, 2011), among them that she had been kidnapped by a certain nanny early in June.
Unlike other fields, this research incorporates significant aspects of numerous competing descriptions of policy alternatives into a united model. Additionally, this text accentuates the significance of put into practice policy as an imperative tool in the eventual results of decisions based on policy measures.
Justice is one of the main pillars on which a modern society is built. This is due to various reasons. One is the basic premise of fear upon which Criminal Justice systems work. The fear of punishment and public disgrace is something that prevents many from committing what the society considers to be crime.
The author suggests that intense legal proceedings or trials can result into traumatic experiences for witnesses. Asking a child witness to recall events that involved perpetration of horrendous crimes would trigger memories, which could be detrimental to the child. Such cases could involve sexual ordeals.
According to the author terrorism currently is assumed to be a constant threat not only for people but for organizations, institutions and for the society as a whole. Courts are no exception to plan for their security. Though, the general menaces encountered in courts are usually of interpersonal nature where individuals may attack on each other.
The norms set down by the practice are often contradictory, quite understandably because the detective is not a mere observer or one who wants to treat the suspect but one who often deceives in order to gather grounds to convict and punish. Detectives may relish principles of fairness and dignity but which are often unclear, gleaned from consequences and justification.