Life is moving too fast and keeping pace with all the developments often requires taking a great deal of risks. Wider processes of globalization have generated new forms of memory. In the age of globalization, remembering things is a matter of being exposed to the electronic media, to store one’s memory such as meeting deadlines or even recollecting one’s own culture and heritage.
The currents of globalization have been provoked by new challenges in the social structure. With the changing face of the planet, cultural identity has raised issues pertaining to the construction of memories, both cultural and historical (Colmeiro 2011). This situation is most likely to occur in locations which have witnessed cold war and dictatorship in their societies, seeking to revive their past. The last decade of the twentieth century saw many social and historical changes. The revelation of the effect of globalization on mankind gave way to cultural anxieties resulting in the fear of loss of memory. Memory is often studied with connection to national identity as a unique dimension of nationalism (Bell 2003). It, thus, touches the brim of three distinctive features of society: nationalism, cultural identity and historical identity, before it reaches out as playing an integral part in the advent of globalization (Musner 2000).
Much of the data found on the theoretical perspective of memory is with reference to the holocaust and politics in general. In light of the violation of human rights, scholars argue that it is necessary to strongly discourage the “ethnic and nationalistic abuse of history and memory”, demanding an authoritarian politics for making amends for this abuse. The contravention of rights has often resulted from incursion of other nations or through a mere global impact. It becomes necessary to expand upon the term “globalization” for a better understanding