It will analyze how effective these intervention measures have been over the long period in history in which they have been in operation. This will be done through an analysis of the records that have been kept regarding intervention measures and their effect on recidivism rates.
Statistics show that California holds the largest number of young female prisoners when compared to all the other states in America. The country has the two largest prisons for women in the world that are located in Chowchilla. The largest number of incarcerated females is juveniles as they have a higher tendency to engage in crime as opposed to those advanced in age. As it would least be expected, most of the prisons in that state have a very high percentage of males working in female prisons. This poses a very big threat on the welfare and wellbeing of the female juveniles. In fact, this percentage of male workers in female prisons is higher than any other in the world. Out of the 30 million people incarcerated in that state, 11,250 are women as compared to a country like Germany which has 80 million incarcerated and holds only 800 women. The question that now comes to mind is what has led to such a high number of women being imprisoned? According to credible sources, most of the females were arrested as victims of property or drug related crimes which were mostly meant for survival (Carlifornia Prison Focus, 2005). About 33% of these women are able to participate in any educational activity as they were still very young and full of potential. This problem of female incarceration mainly affects African American as well as Latino women more than it does the white. Probably this is because these women are more exposed to harsh conditions that push them into participating in crime for survival.
Many meta-analyses have been conducted in a bid to gauge the effect of programs on the recidivism of juvenile offenders (Cullen, 2007). However, most of these studies were conducted in a