The claim of the opposition to be the legitimate government is backed up by the quantity of its mass followers. It is the responsibility of established governments to maintain a healthy police system, which will fight violence whenever it arises in a country. Security forces that will enhance security against foreign threats should be put in place.Political violence in a state is extremely dangerous as it is with terrorism. It puts a state into a state of anxiety thus threatening its security. All governments should put in place ways in which they can fight such threats without putting their citizens and its neighboring states in a compromising situation. Most measures of anti-terrorism are done by the police and the military army of the country. The best solution should be that they try to strike peaceful talks with the enemy so that they solve the existing conflicts which will ease the pressure and be less costly to the nation's economy (Vasilios 2).Nations should learn from states like Ireland, Israel, Palestine and Sri Lanka, where a lot of terrorist activities have been happening. This only proves how the state government is not keen on dealing with terrorists. It is with normalcy that, the military has been trained to fight in battles while the police have the skills to deal with normal crime and maintain social order. This should automatically result in a special branch of police like SWAT and other military departments being developed to fight terrorism crimes (Rabkin 2).
Cite this document
(“Definition Of Terrorism Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/sociology/510451-paper
(Definition Of Terrorism Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“Definition Of Terrorism Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/sociology/510451-paper.
Cited: 0 times
One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter. The writer of the paper "Definition Of Terrorism" discusses the history of terrorism and examples of countries that have experienced different forms of terrorist attacks. The paper also examines the ways of dealing with it…
Since then the United States and other countries across the world has become more proactive in the fight against terrorism. Terrorism has been defined in different ways. The definition of terrorism has been impacted upon depending upon public and societal perspective and how it changes over time.
This observation of Michael Stohl in 1979 continues to be valid more than three decades later. Academics constantly attempt to understand terrorism, its potential threat as well as terrorist activity; however law enforcement is no closer to comprehending terrorism and its repercussions.
This was done to get a responsible and experienced individual to act as leader of the American intelligence community while also remaining as the chief consultant to the President regarding intelligence problems regarding the country’s security. The DCI was also the head of the CIA.
However, the fact is that this power has taken away the privacy and liberty-a very necessary part of American life-from the lives of people. One of the perfect examples of this situation is the case of Ashton Lundeby, a sixteen year old who was arrested for allegedly sending bomb threat; and according to reports, he was arrested from his home on the night of 15 February and is denied the right to get due process (Lamb, 2009).
The FBI (2002) explains, "Domestic terrorism refers to activities that involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or any state; appear to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population
riticized, there is no solid standard in which its meaning can be derived from; hence, there is a very high variation on the way terrorism is understood and perceived with respect to the manifold national legislations. Indeed, the meaning of terrorism does change the definition
This essay analyses Jasper’s No State Sponsors, No Terror and argues that while the most successful international terrorists have thrived with the aid of material state-sponsorship, terrorism can succeed without state-sponsorship.
According to the report defining the international terrorism captures the act(s) which are dangerous to humans and which violate the US criminal laws or which would be interpreted as criminal violations when interpreted according to jurisdictions of the federal states or any state. Assassinations majorly characterize the international terrorism.
The writer pays much attention to ideological or symbolic aspect of terrorism. He thinks that symbolic component of terrorist activity is determined by symbolic nature of social systems. Symbolic methods used for terrorist attack to arouse fear and disgust can be overcome only by means of symbolic methods.