On the contrary, measuring incorporation by convergence to the mean is not an accurate and fair measure. This is because, basing on convergence to the mean as the principal mobility measure, results to an incomplete portrait of the incorporation process. Hence, the dire need for an alternative way to measure incorporation.
For purposes of reaching a complete assessment, there is need to measure the extent to which intergenerational process is demonstrated by the immigrant groups. For instance, checking the extent to which the immigrants’ descendants goes beyond the socioeconomic status measures of the generation of their parents. A good illustration is that of the second-generation Filipinos. These generations possesses significant low levels of education and achievements occupationally in comparison to their parents. Nevertheless, their socioeconomic status attainment levels are equal to those of non-Latinos whites and extremely higher with regards to those of the American adult citizens. Even though they are heading in a downward direction with reference to the first generation, Filipino second-generation accrues some benefits from the high levels of human capital exceptionally from their parents. However, the Mexicans second-generation demonstrates high education levels and occupational attainment in comparison to those parents who arrived with low socioeconomic status levels that has become extremely difficult to drop. Given the fact that Mexican’s second generations are achieving an upward mobility with reference to their parents, they still lag behind in the American population mean. On the other hand, whereas the second-generation to the Filipinos have acquired a convergence high degrees to the native-born mean, Mexican second generation have achieved intergenerational mobility highest degree that is based on social