This paper discusses three ethical issues of the right to health services and explains how classical theories can be used to resolve the problem.
Here, are those people who maintain that health is an individual responsibility. They do not want a system that will require them to contribute in taxed; in terms of contributing some dollars that will help in supporting their fellow citizens who cannot handle the responsibility of protecting or promoting their own health. Those people who believe that healthcare is a right to each and every individual join and support a universal health care system. The system argues that each and every citizen has the right to access medical care at the appropriate time and that the responsibility of the government is to protect the citizens and at times protect some individuals from themselves (Shafer-Landau, 2007).
Both arguments and approaches arise from two different ideologies; they are both good arguments, but neither of them can be taken to support the argument of implementing or denying denial of health care services (Devettere, 2002). The matter must be resolved with an ethical framework. Ethics refers to determining what is right and what is wrong in terms of how human beings relate to each other. An ethical decision that involves the health care rights will then have to be resolved, or acted upon when considering the relationships human beings have between each other and not based on individual interests (Shafer-Landau, 2007).
All ethical decisions are structured around values individuals will have to agree on the collective value of fairness and equity and embrace the goal of fulfilling their collective responsibility to one another while still maintaining the right and freedoms of individuals (Naden 40). Virtual ethics is a classical theory that can resolve this problem; this theory describes the character of a moral