Sociology Exercise - Essay Example

Over the years, the Americans have intensified their cultures to a degree that some are not acceptable in other countries. Some people believe that their mannerisms are quite peculiar. This could be because of the many immigrants in the country. As people settle, they borrow different practices from each other. When these practices are merged, they end up being atypical. Most countries do not allow people of similar sexes to marry. United States of America is one of the few countries that have made laws in favor of gay marriages.

However, it is essential to note that these laws are made by states since the federal government does not recognize the marriages. This move leads to many questions since America is rated among the top countries in religion beliefs. Recent studies have proved that most of the people living in United States of America are strong believers. For this reason, it is quite odd to have believers accept these types of marriages (Rauch 34). This cultural practice proves that the marriages are an extension of national human rights to the minorities.

People have been unable to stop this culture because it is likened to the prohibiting of interracial marriages. In the country, there are laws that show that there is freedom of choice. This freedom has been argued to be limited by those who are not in favor of the marriages. Since some prominent scientists and other people have backed up these marriages, they have continually been accepted in various parts. There are dangers of exporting this culture to other countries. First, it will cause a main division between the country leaders and the religious leaders.

This can have attached effects to the fellow citizens because of the indifferences. It is vital to note that acceptance of these marriages redefines the original meaning of marriage (Rauch 101). According to Karl, there is always a reason for division of labor, which is mostly related to gender. Women are in most cases referred to as the weaker people, leading to jobs that are less tiring. In relation to this, Karl identifies different reasons that give reasons for people entering to production of requirements and facilities in life (Wheen 124).

Many authors have tried to give their ideas on the differences related to wealth and income. Many of them have come up with their descriptions, but there are still a number of contradictions. According to Dalton, social and the economic class cannot be described by income but the wealth, a person has. When it comes to the comparisons, it is imperative to not that wealth involves the count of both income and assets acquired whereas income has the involvement of only cash acquired par certain time given.

In the count of a person’s wealth, assets are mostly used, but the liabilities are not incorporated in the outcome. It is significant to understand that wealth is those things that are of economic value, which involves the value of ownership. Income can be identified as the inflow of objects that add up to the economic value. It is extremely easy to calculate or identify when wealth changes, but for income, it is in most cases of the same value. To calculate the change of wealth one requires the amount of income required and the total expenses.

Once these are acquired the total amount of expenses are subtracted from the income amount (Atkins 57). The above information is essential because in order to understand a family’s well-being and the life chances of its children, one needs to