Horn’s account is based on the Juke Box era in Britain. The youth culture at the time (1945-1960) is evaluated and analysed in terms of how the American culture influenced it. At the time, there were massive social, economic, and political changes that were being experienced. Nations were subject to the influence of other nations, and so was the youth culture around the world. On the other hand, Fowler considers the position of youth culture in a modernized Britain. Given the two accounts, the link between youth culture and the modern world is realized.
While the Juke Box era in Britain was relatively different from that in America, the fact that American culture was influential over the Britain culture is hard to refute. Juke Box culture in Britain was highly subject to American influence. In other words, youth cultures and subcultures across the globe in the 1950s and 1960ss were influenced by major social, economic, and political events that were taking place around the world (Fowler, 2008). However, amid the persistent American influence on youth culture in Britain, Britain’s youth culture was relatively stable in avoiding enormous effects of foreign influence.
On the other hand, Fowler observed that Britain had maintained its culture with or without America influence. For this reason, modern Britain accounted for its own youth culture that it shaped over time. While Horn accounts for Juke Box culture in both Britain and America, Fowler considers the actual events that shaped youth culture like music genres, entertainment, and leisure activities. On the same note, it is important to highlight that Horn also considered the rock ‘n’ roll in relation to Britain’s youth culture. In regard to rock ‘n’ roll, youth culture was minimally subject to outside influence.
The two texts are essentially rooted in youth culture and subculture, influencing forces acting on youth culture, and over time