To answer such question evaluation has to be a done by the stakeholders and the public.
The program was undertaken at the Northeastern State University. There were various reasons that led to the selection of this university for the programme. These included the fact that the social work department wanted to find out the programme’s effectiveness. This evaluates things such as skills of the staff to deliver the required content, the satisfaction of the participants in the programme, the benefits of the participants in the programme and among other questions (Kemple, F. 2003). The programme was also carried out in this university to show the effectiveness of the teaching and learning to the funders and the community at large. The programme aimed at improving the staff’s frontline practices with some participants. Students were randomly chosen to determine their scores at different times of the term. This system was preferred because most of the student’s performances were changing at different times of the year. To meet the educational objectives, there was an outcry in the society to ensure that student performance improves as the year moves to the end.
The professor used resource management to gather information used. This method used to gather the deep and breadth information (Kemple, F. 2003). Therefore, some students were required to fill a practicum or it can be an individual with the teacher for the period totaling to 220 hours across the semester. These were done at a specific time to ensure that every detail specified in the objective is covered. The supervisors in the assessment sheet recorded the student’s performances, at the mid-term and end term. The scale ranges from one to five, where one shows unsatisfactory, two needs improvement, student with three is satisfactory and four is above average, and finally those who score five has mastered the content. Through this