Any action that is repeated frequently becomes cast into a pattern, which can then be reproduced with an economy of effort and which, ipso facto, is apprehended by its performer as that pattern. Habitualization further implies that the action in question may be performed again in the future in the same manner and with the same economical effort. This is true of non-social as well as of social activity (61).
To illustrate how this concept applies on individuals and society as a whole, we use an example to better understand the theory. As an example, we can cite an extreme case to illustrate our point, say for example terrorism. For most of us in the United States or in the opposing side of terror, we perceive it as despicable, barbaric and criminal which takes innocent lives and that the activities to sow terror is pointless. We see them as twisted and perhaps even sick. We arrive at his perception because we remember the 9/11 attack where we have lost many love ones and many brave people which explains why we take the attack as despicable. On the other side however, they defined this situation differently and not even near how the western defines their act. For them, they are freedom fighters and what they did was not an act of terror but an act of continued war against the oppression of the west. They seek to advance the society that they wanted to have and also to avenge themselves of the injustices that American imperialism has inflicted to them. Apparently, there is a huge disconnect between these two groups perceived their acts.
This disconnect in the perception of an act, which is a product of how differently people perceive their world of which they act accordingly, is dependent on how they are brought up and experienced life.
And why is it an important concept to take into account when attempting to understand and explain human social behavior? Specifically, explain and