Therefore, I disagree with the proposition that science tells us the truth about reality.
We have heard and read of various scientific developments that have been achieved but hey keep on having something added onto them. Some of these dates way back in the BC era while others are recent. There is a trend that the most recent scientific developments are the most dominant. This occurs as a result of the synergistic nature of research in science. It is not appropriate to assume that any scientist has ever discovered an absolute scientific fact, thus is because someone may think in another line and present an argument that has some facts. For example science will tell us that energy is neither lost r gained, but another individual may come up with a more convincing reason why this is not the reality. If such is able to convince the masses then their prevailing theory is dispelled. In the old times, the scientific truth about the shape of the earth was that it was flat. However, after Galilei Galileo’s examination he got every reason to believe that the earth is round. Another example is the recent arguments that Pluto is a non-existent planet. This eliminates the position that was taken.
There are areas that science is completely dumb about. Science lies on evidence that can analyzed time and time again. Aspects that seem unnatural have no scientific explanation at all. For example, it is difficult to analyze scientifically something like witchcraft. It is no dispute that such a thing exists, or some other supernatural forces control the world. Places such as the Bermuda triangle lacks appropriate scientific explanation and hence has no scientific solutions. Therefore, the fact that science remains silent on these aspects reveals that whatever is revealed as scientific truth does not met the threshold of being reality. Even some aspects have been characterized and explanations given but these explanations