It can therefore be inferred that females of a society are always endangered and devalued in a number of complex ways (Wolf, 1996).
Due to the less advantaged position of women in nearly all societies of the world, the female pattern of thinking is totally different from that of the males because the responsibilities and the consequences of responsibilities are quite different for females as compared to males. Smith therefore asserts that to get a fairer picture of the realities of the society, and especially the females of a society, the females of the society should be allowed to take the role of a judge, instead of males.
Smith’s is of the idea that “we lived in a world put together in ways in which we had had very little say”. She accuses men of being the rule setters of a society; a society which then expects its female class to follow the rules set by the male class. The rules are made to benefit the ruling class, so much so that the females are “deprived of the authority to speak”; even the languages are largely developed by the males of the society, so the words present in any language are also inclined towards translating the feelings of males only (Smith, 2002).
In Smith’s understanding, the “sexual division of labor” places women in a unique social position where it is possible for them only to experience the realities of the society in real form. Men on the other hand, due to the same labor division are unable to experience real social relations and therefore continue to exploit the females. Although this is unintentional in most cases, as most males tend to follow the norms of the society; the males fail to appreciate the real conditions of the society by being superior in position to the females in social terms (Harding, 1987).
Standpoint feminism has never promoted the idea of studying masculinity as it is only focused on highlighting the victimization