While it is clear that this structure of the government limits the abuse of power among the public, it is clear that such a government structure is oppressive and overrides the rights of the people. The leaders use this power to accomplish their personal interests without minding about the rights of the citizens. On this note, it is clear that the totalitarianism is a weak government structure that should be abolished. This essay evaluates the situation in National Socialist Germany and Stalinist Russia as some of the infamous totalitarianistic structures.
One of the challenges in this government structure is the high risk of abuse of power by the national leaders. Typically, the government holds all the power and have the liberty to use in whatever manner and even suiting their personal interests. Such abuse of power subjects the public to political oppression, becoming a source of suffering for them. In the Stalinist Russia, the public have suffered for long due to the leaders ambitions to pursue their personal selfish needs. Stalin remained in power by ensuring that there was no state criticism among the public. The poets and song writers were not allowed to criticise the government and had to write poems and songs that only praised him (Overy 34). In National Socialist Germany the leader ensured his political survival by forcing the people to remain loyal. For instance, all those who were disloyal to the oppressive laws had to die in public to ensure that there was not disloyalty. As such, these tyrannical government structures provide opportunities for the leaders to abuse the rights of the people while pursuing personal interests.
Another weakness of the totalitarianism is that it inhibits economic development of the society. The political leaders in such a government structure are more focused on power rather than its distribution. The state does not consider the input of the public, which makes it difficult to understand the problems of