As a result, all sociological theories that have a sense of interactionism in them provide scholars with a tool and platform to study societies and individuals in a more productive way.
As Atkinson and Housley (2003) say, although there are so many sociological theories that have been developed over time, those that have integrationist approaches tend to have a better way of understanding the society. Interactionism in fact can be seen, in a sense, as the unifying theory of sociology (Reynolds & Herman, 2003). Most schools of thought in sociology seem to appreciate the fact that people interact with each other in a way that helps in shaping and determining their attitudes, character and even their consciousness. This is the best explained by interactinist theories, of which there are many. The other thing that is necessary to note with regard to the internationalist theories is that they differ from earlier approaches in that they are more practical and provable than the earlier theories.
With interactionism, it is easy to measure and determine various aspects of the social equations. This can be best seen in ethnomethodology. This method of understanding the society looks at the people in their context of action and then tries to determine why and how people think in the way they do. By not necessarily developing a complex theory, ethnomethodology looks at social interactions as an almost automatic mechanism which drives actions and thoughts as well as the rationality of people (Flynn, 1991). Based on this fact, it can then be seen that consciousness of the same people is determined by the processes in the human societies in which they live. Earlier sociological theories were complex and had no easy way of measuring the various variables thus making them more of pseudo-scientific.
As the field of sociology has advanced, more scholars have seen themselves gravitating towards the interactionism because of the practicality. As Garfinkel has put