The first section discusses the argument that imperialism is a part of the cycles of capitalism. The second section discusses ‘accumulation by dispossession’ as a permanent part of capitalism. The third section discusses how crucial is war to underpinning the theory of the new imperialism. The last part is a conclusive response to the entire analysis. Imperialism as a Part of the Cycles of Capitalism David Harvey describes the new imperialism in relation to two power logics: (1) capitalist logic of power, and (2) territorial logic of power. Harvey states that the former “operates in continuous space and time” 2 and sustains capitalistic operations via market processes; whilst the latter “operates in a territorialised and, at least in democracies, in a temporality dictated by an electoral cycle.”3 However, in the case of imperialism, so as to sustain one’s supremacy it should expand and strengthen its ‘territorial logic of power’ outside its boundaries, and reinforce political division of power. ...Show more
Globalisation and Imperialism: An Analysis of The New Imperialism by David Harvey Essay May 23, 2012 1890 words Name Name of University Introduction A new historical age was expected to arrive in the 1970s. This age has been illustrated in different ways. A number of theories have highlighted cultural transformations, whilst others emphasise economic changes, transformations in the financial and business world, or in marketing and production…
Products of whatever kind and products that threatened world extinction began to dominate man’s quest for progress and development. That is materialism at its worst, or at its best. Recent authors and commentators assert that globalisation began at the end of the Cold War which was in the period 1989-1991.
Grounded on the Marxist theory of the state, this essay attempts to debunk the popular view that globalisation is by-passing the state and is causing the demise of the state. Thus, this essay asserts that globalisation does not by-pass and cannot cause the demise of nation-states.
Globalization is associated with four types of change. First, it is associated with a spreading of economic activities across frontiers, regions and continents. Secondly, it is characterized by an increase in the interdependence of trade, investment, finance, migration, culture, etc.
Has globalisation started the process of promoting a single common world culture? Has globalisation led to inequality of nations and has it widened or closed the gap between the developing and developed economies? These questions help us to provide adequate understanding of the process of globalisation.
On the other hand, any planning approach which depends rather exclusively on fiscal or pure economic policies from the top eventually finds itself mired in a cycle of underdevelopment, or gross economic growth without equitable human development.
Few global economic ideologies or phenomenon have instigated as much controversy as has globalisation. Proponents perceive of it as a blueprint for the globalisation of capital whose benefits, among others, include the transfer of business interests and foreign direct investment to the Lesser Developed Countries of the South (LDC), thereby propelling their economic development and industrialisation.
Most colonizers imposed their cultures on the colonies because it was seen as a tool to strengthen commerce, political influence, and trade in abroad. There emerged various forms of imperialism including
16 pages (4000 words)Essay
Get a custom paper written by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Didn't find an essay?
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org