Most arguments of opponents of same-sex marriage are anchored on religion as the basis of their position. As it goes in the Catholic religion and as often said in every marriage ceremony, ‘What God has put together, let no man put asunder.’ This speaks of the notion of the inviolability of marriage as an institution that must not be broken by another. But of course we all know that divorce is even more of a reality than marriages that actually do last a lifetime. If we are to follow the bible in its strictest sense then divorce should not be legalized. But this is where the Establishment Clause of the Constitution sets in and where the separation of church and state bears its most significant aspect. It is clear that the church and state must be detached from one another in a way that the church does not interfere with the affairs of government and their aim of instituting sound public policies in the same way that the church is free to look out for the spiritual welfare of their followers without intervention from the state.
Justin Wilson proposes that among the problems that arise out of the dispute stems from the lack of a clear definition of marriage and the intrinsic difference between a religious marriage and a civil marriage. Consequently, it is in the former that religious intervention is a matter of circumstance since it is through the rites provided for by a specific faith that two people are wed. In this case, religious orders have a broader claim to support their argument against same-sex marriage. as it is subject to teachings and traditions that would inevitably prohibit them to allow such unions. But the latter would provide for grounds that enables the legalization of same-sex marriage. Civil marriage also gives allocation to be able to recognize the needs that families of same-sex partners and that they must be afforded protection by law for their benefit in