I find this tactical approach bereft of the convection where we expect an author to define what they are talking about. However, from the flow of the ideas, one cannot fail to tell from what standpoint Ahmed addresses the topic. According to my observation of the text, I find her base her arguments on some history and having an anti-racist and feminist standpoint.
Sara Ahmed’s skepticism concerning happiness as a path of good life is very reasonable. In her argument, she puts into perspective the concept of happiness having a close association with some aspects in life and being disassociated with others. In my opinion, it is not appropriate to associate happiness with some of the choices made while differing it from others. According to the author, the presence of “right associations” (p.2) constitutes the true happiness. While this is not the absolute position, it has some basis of what constitutes happiness. It is not always the case as argued by Ahmed that those that go against the norms are the unhappy ones. In some instances, that happiness can emanate from doing things in a different way. Happiness cannot be argued to be based on one or two factors because it has a broad perspective and relates to a number of issues based on individuality and the societal perceptions. The response by Ahmed to the development of books that deals with happiness is that they do not capture the true picture of happiness. I agree with her proposition that the main issue that requires to be addressed as far as happiness is concerned is the ideals that inform on perceptions about good life.
The author goes ahead to describe what she refers as the “the happiness turn” (p.3). She beliefs that the books that have been developed as from 2005 on economics and positive psychology have influenced the perception of individuals on happiness. In this regard, I concur with her proposition that finding a measure of happiness as it has been brought forth is a