Even though, most of the people agree that public protest is the only way that the public can express dissatisfaction, some think that consensus is the best way to deal with such issues. Public protest has been used to force leaders out of power as in the case of Egypt. Some protests have managed to “change” the minds of leaders on certain issues (Iwabuchi 2002, 27). Media has been such a powerful tool in influencing what happens before, during and after mass public protest and in that respect media representation must be accorded the necessary attention that it deserve in order to allow key stakeholders assess the role and impact of the media in the event of such public protest.
On September 26th, a protest erupted in Hong Kong and all of a sudden all the local and international media attention was turned to the city. Within a few minutes, almost all the media houses around the globe started giving reports on all the events taking place during the protest. The Hong Kong 2014 public protest is not an isolated incident where media has had huge representation (Fang & Moro 2010, 86). According to most media houses both local and international, the reason for the protest was due to a decision made by Beijing in regards elections. The suggestion were based on the procedure of events during the electioneering period were to be carried in the Chinese regions. The international media also reported that the protestors were also calling for the resignation of Hong Kongs top leader C.Y Leung whom they perceive to be a dummy of Beijing (LEE, etal 2002, 75).
Majority of media houses across the globe especially those in the United States and across Europe paid a lot of interest on election and democracy issues in Hong Kong, however this was not the case with the vast number of Chinese media. Thus, it brings out the question of how the media has been representing facts about protest. The