This belief is justified on the notion that teaching children can be compared to the art of molding pottery which requires tools in order to achieve the desired shape. Therefore, similar restrictions and disciplinary measures ought to be applied to a child in order to mould his or her behaviors and thoughts in becoming a better person. For other parents, they believe that children should be left to decide on where they belong in terms of aptitude for learning. Therefore, children have the capacity to find out and learn for themselves the essential education needs they require to become better people. On the other hand, according to Socrates and Plato, they equally espouse a similar ideology pertaining to education. In this regard, they both believe the primary motive of educating a child is to make them just and assisting in building a just society or city. In this regard, both philosophers contend that educating young children is important since they are the guardians of the city. In this regard, I am expressly in support of the teaching methods and form of education espoused by Plato and Socrates. However, there are several teaching methods that I am opposed to. Foremost, the physical punishment meted out on a child is not right and equally forbidden by law in progressive countries such as the United States of America. Evidently, the corporal punishment meted out on a child is a form of child abuse. In addition, it is not possible to use tools and rules in the name of restricting children and disciplining them. This is because each child is unique in their behaviors and thought process. On the issue of different thought processes, it is good as long as it satisfies the ultimate goal of being just.
This notion is further supported by Plato as he indicated in his work that each individual have their own place in the city and that