On Famine, Affluence and Morality - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
On Famine, Affluence and Morality

Despite the seemingly well-intentioned solution that Singer proposes in his essay article, there are three counter arguments against his point of view. One criticism is that the proposition of Singer is found to be too radical to the current moral standing of society today. Society today would rather outright condemn people who break the moral norms than a state of moral wrong. Singer argues that such moral standing should not to be a justification to not look beyond one’s own social problems and to be concerned with the moral problems. The matter falls that societies which have more than enough wealth do nothing to help populations which are in abject poverty while knowing something can be done to remedy it.The second objection to Singer’s proposition is that there should be a clear distinction between the act of helping the poor as either charity or duty. This is where the problem of Utilitarianism as a consequentialist form of ethics lies. Alexander and Moore (2007) observed that “according to critics, for consequentialists, there is no realm of moral permissions, no realm of going beyond one's moral duty (supererogation), no realm of moral indifference, and all acts are seemingly either required or forbidden”. It would be viewed as ethically problematic to force the wealthy individuals to give up some of their wealth against their will, regardless how noble the intentions are. However, Singer argues that an individual should always to do whatever would avert the greatest amount of bad. ...
Download paper


The following essay under the title "On Famine, Affluence, and Morality" concerns the article written by Peter Singer that points out the solution to famine is the moral obligation of the wealthy to donate a portion of their belongings to the poor…
Author : clotilde64

Related Essays

Relativism and Morality
This research will begin with the first area relativism and morality which according to Lenn Goodman is genocide etc., All people have a right to live and right to be alive irrespective of their race, color, creed and language. Taking away one’s life under whatever pretext is wrong. Murder is wrong because it denies the person’s opportunity to live. Genocide is a wholesale murder which is murder committed in a large scale. According to Lenn. E. Goodman “genocide targets individuals as members of a group, seeking to destroy a race, a culture a linguistic or ethnic identity, even a...
3 pages (753 words) Assignment
Relativism and Morality.
In many societies, morality is a controversial issue as it varies across different cultures and communities. Morality refers to acceptable behavior in a specific society or context. Alternatively, moral minima go hand in hand with the concept of morality. Civilization has changed the concept of moral minima as morality can be explained in numerous ways depending on an individual’s perspective. We make moral decisions in everyday of our lives. Some are of importance while others are not; some are morally right while others are simply wrong. In morality, some things are regarded as being...
4 pages (1004 words) Assignment
Relativism and Morality
Rape, as yet another example, is a violation of the victim’s personal will and also exploits the victim (Goodman, 2010). However, Goodman is attempting to impose a set of universalist values which are not always going to be embraced by different cultures. In Africa, as one example, rape is a common practice engaged with members of the military and within the family dynamic. When the individual that has been the victim of rape becomes accustomed to this lifestyle, without proper guidance about the morality and ethics of the act, they are simply not educated that rape within the family unit is...
3 pages (753 words) Research Paper
Sen's Explanation of the Great Bengal Famine
Grappling with Arrow's paradox, Sen "returned to first principles on the nature of choice," explains Desai, who teaches economics at the London School of Economics. A person choosing to buy fish rather than meat may not be asserting a simple preference for fish, Sen pointed out. He may be acting on a whim, or perhaps participating in a meat boycott in support of a meatpackers' strike. "Sen showed that we must take into account notions of sympathy or commitment in order to understand voting behavior, paying for public goods.and so on." In short, he brought economics closer to the real world....
14 pages (3514 words) Book Report/Review
Singer moral principle. Peter Singer and greatest happiness principle.
Peter Singer's article 'Famine, Affluence and Morality' is an interesting read even though it is difficult to agree totally with his point of view. His view "If we can prevent something bad without sacrificing anything of comparable significance, we ought to do it." does not sound very practical. In this article he has emphasized on two issues. One issue is an analogy provided by him. In this analogy he mentions that if a child is drowning in a pond then we should save him if there is no fear of risking our lives in that act. If we really face such a situation then it would without doubt be a...
7 pages (1757 words) Book Report/Review
Conventional Morality Essay
In Beyond Good and Evil, published in 1886 Nietzche suggested that there are only a few qualities that are held by all genuine philosophers: these are imagination, self-assertion, danger, originality and what he termed "creation of values" (Nietzsche, 2003, p.1). He denies many of the concepts that have concerned philosophers in the past such as "free will", "knowledge" and "truth" in exchange for what he terms the will to power. The will to power suggests that there is no absolute code of morality that human beings either should or can live by.
4 pages (1004 words) Essay
3 Theories of Morality
The perspective of Immanuel Kant seems quite different. It is focused on duty and an appreciable extent of obligation (Dark, 2010). He appears to believe that every human being is faced with a responsibility to the right thing in situations where he or she needs to make an ethical decision. This is based on the premise of moral law, which means that Kant adopts a legalistic point of view in theorizing morality. In this regard, Kant draws heavily on the power of reason, as opposed to that of character. Mill adopts a slightly similar perspective.
2 pages (502 words) Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!