condition, the consequences of this dynamic eventually permeate the daily life of millions of people. Apparently there is a model, which currently governs the finance and markets, designed to dilute any possibility of transforming as suggested by the tens of failed revolutions, philanthropic oriented systems lighten the consequences but not to change the bases, etc (Hoch, and Sumaria Mohan-Neill, p. 31).
The study of Oxfam indicates that, despite multiple complaints for campaigns and seen little or no effect in determining the currently reality, levels of inequality have grown in the last twenty years (Saez, Emmanuel, and Gabriel Zucman, p. 2014).
According to Oxfam, with only a quarter of the official fortunes accumulated by the hundred richest men on the planet, about 240 billion dollars, enough to lift out of poverty the worlds population living in these conditions.
According to a UN report, published in 2005, in countries like United States, 1% of the most affluent population, control over resources that 95% of disadvantaged people (while, according to recently learned, in Mexico 1.2% have 43% of wealth ) (Fredriksen, p.929).
“Economically inefficient, politically corrosive, socially divisive and environmentally destructive. We cannot continue to pretend that creating wealth for a few inevitably end up benefiting the many -of done the opposite usually happens “
An interesting factor, the huge sums of money that the wealthy kept outside the official margin suggests that in fact the numbers are much cruder. A year ago James Henry, a former economist at McKinsey, published a report on tax havens. According to the document, it is estimated that between $ 21,000 million dollars and $ 32 billion (trillion) safe fiscal monitoring, and owned precisely the main billionaires. The reason is simple: do not want their fortunes overflowing shaved by tax requirements imposed by the governments of the countries in which they operate. Something that is even