Closely related to Mead’s early ideas, more recent social-psychological thinkers have come up with their own philosophies that the social self is a product of interaction with two or more people. For instance, the self as a mother is a social self owing to the fact that a mother cannot exist without a child.
The article, “The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods” by Mead trickles down to Meads conclusion that the way one views him or herself, is socially constructed with the individual’s ability to “take the role of others”. The social self exists in two forms, the “I” and the “me”. The “I” are the actions one takes while the “me” puts into consideration how others will react to any actions the “I” takes.
Charles Horton Cooley, an American sociologist, came up with the term “Looking-Glass to suggested that people finally gain their social identity by comparing themselves with what other people think of them. Cooley’s work exemplified James’ idea of the self to slot in its meta-cognitive capacity, that is, its capability to reflect upon itself. The “looking-glass self” is a self-image based on a changing interaction between how others see someone and how one sees him or herself (Cooley, 1964). I Cooley reseach, Human Nature and the Social Order, he outlines the following steps in this elaborate reciprocal course of action of social self-perception.(1) One creates an image of how they give the impression of being, personality and individuality; (2) One uses the response of others to deduce how he/she is understood; (3) One build up a self-concept, constructive or destructive, in accordance to these analysis. The “looking-glass self” entails, as a result, a progression of self-discovery and self-interpretation that commence at an untimely and persist to be personalized all the way through one’s life as long as one employ in social interactions.
In summary, in the