irst important points that he makes in the documentary is that insurance companies who operate within the American society are largely responsible for the failures of the healthcare system to successful satisfy the needs of the people. It was found that in the United States the above mentioned kind of companies is more concerned with ensuring return on investment rather than providing a high quality insurance coverage (Eitzen, Zinn and Eitzen Smith 490). Indeed, the documentary shows that these companies charge their client tremendous amounts of money and are more interested in gaining revenue and not in paying for medical costs.
There is peculiar story that the movie opens with. A middle aged man Rick, lost tips of two of his fingers: the middle and the ring ones. When he asked for medical assistance, he was provided with two options: $60,000 for the former and $12,000 for the latter finger. It was never properly explained to him why there was such a difference in prices of making a surgery on fingers that are so close to each other. Nevertheless, the story of Rick shows that in the United States of America companies who work for profit try to place “price tags” on parts of the body of their clients in order to earn more.
Finally, there is another scene in the documentary which shows the way insurance companies try to secure their income. Moore points out that in order to find a person who will be a good client (which means he or she will pay the insurance and not require any funds), the companies designed a list of possible health conditions that would not allow one to get an insurance since otherwise it would be too costly for them to treat one. This means that in theory, insurance companies want to provide their services to completely healthy people which makes the latter simply a source of income for them.
The next important point which is articulated in Sicko focuses on the fact that citizens of the United States of America do not have equal access to