There is no doubt that this phenomenon is important from the sociological point of view. So, it may be necessary to analyze the different points of view on this issue.
On the one hand, the fact that norms for medical practice vary can be viewed from a positive perspective. Indeed, this allows them to be more flexible and adapt to every particular situation (Wallace, 2009). There is no doubt that this is a rather important characteristic as medicine is an area which should take into account all the conditions in order to bring benefits to the people. This means that norms for medical practice should vary as this ensures that a person and one’s problems are not caught into one size fits all approach and are being treated without any regard to their uniqueness. In other words, a variation of norms contributes to the effectiveness of medicine to a certain extent.
On the other hand, the previously mentioned idea also causes some troubles when it comes to interacting with the patients. This, there might be a situation when a part of the country has adopted a different set of the norm if compared to other places. All this leads to a state when people might feel deprived of certain conditions that they deem to be beneficial. In other words, if taken to an extreme, unification of norms may surely cause some problems, but on average it ensures that patients around the country are treated equally (Prakash & Bhardwaj, 2011). It is beyond any doubt that health care is an important part of social life, so the principle of equality and uniformity should be maintained there in order not to disrupt the social environment.