She further explained that the reason different cultures defined roles differently were because societies had different values and norms.
Mead compares the modern society and the primitive society. According to her, the modern society is not better than the primitive societies because it has not provided room for certain feminine and masculine potentialities. For example, modern society still assumes that as compared to women, men prefer football. According to her, society has such an assumption because men are associated with war but in a real sense, women can also be good football players. Mead argues that in society, there are areas where women are more dominant than men. Similarly, women are entrusted with the task of taking care of children not because men are not able to but because for a long time society associates women with nurturing. Mead notes that men have the potential of being gentle while women have the potential of being rough (Bowman-Kruhm 67). She goes ahead to explain that these differences are only in the mindsets of individuals, but they can be redefined. It is only that society does not give people the opportunity to explore their potential and widen their scope of thinking.
Mead explains that although modern civilization has led to technological advancement and development among other good things, many human factors that contribute to human experience have been left out. She, however, does not totally blame society for this misfortune. She acknowledges that some things are misunderstood by people while others are unrecognized. Mead also argues that society has contributed to individuals missing out on great opportunities due to the perception that some things are unnatural (Chapma 203). She believes that by studying different cultures especially those that are primitive, people could be in a better position of exploring the