This government plays a significant role in the running and administration of the health sector in Britain as a whole. Given that Britain is a member much international organizations, the preservation of human rights is paramount to their nation (Baggott, 24).
Two separate entities provide health care in Britain, the private section that gets its funding from the money given to patients in exchange for the much needed medical services. The second participant is the public sector that is public; it gets funds from the government expenditure that obtains funds from tax payer’s money (Giaimo, 87). Most of the health services are offered free to patients and only pay a small percentage. The private medical services are expensive and cannot be afforded by the poor and the middle class only access these services as benefits from their employers. In cases where the patient can afford the cost, they charge not all the money goes on health care (Olson, 56). The private health entities have always been leaving the hard part and only concentrating on more straightforward elective procedures. It also saves money to increase profit rather than improve services rendered to the patients. The public and private health providers can, however, learn from each other’s experience, and they both can learn from patients as well (Baggott, 45). The public health is of preference to most patients due to its affordable charges and a wide variety of services. The fact that the government closely monitors its operations enhances trust on patients and hope for better services each time (Olson, 34).
Health services get finances from public sources, taxation, and national contributions. The other part gets funds from the private sector, and the payments made direct to the hospitals by patients. Reforms that are coming out since 1997 are massive in scope, and other essential features of