Sociology - Emphasising on Logic and Reason - Term Paper Example

When it comes to actual decision-making, people will rely on statistics in providing enforcement strategies or punitive measures against crime. In either case, the use of literal discourse appears to have minimal effect on the rational choice of individuals.

Emphasizing logic and reason appeals to cognitive behavioral therapy where people peg their decisions on rationalized thoughts conjured in the subconscious mindset. As opposed to focusing on figurative language use, individuals will rely on numerical facts. The predisposition that metaphors alone suffice in making judgments discredits behaviorist theory in decision-making. For instance, right-minded individuals would appeal to imagery and pictures to determine the gravity of a given scenario. Right-minded people do not rely on mathematical or numerical logic because they perceive it as exaggerated.

Consequently, right-minded fellows would rely on metaphors in making decisions. Therefore, the article is not entirely correct to attribute the effect of literal discourse like metaphor usage in decision-making. Human beings rely on both data and figurative expression to offer empathy for a situation and make rational choices (Salah, 2010). A logical and numerical approach used in defining options lacks a holistic view of human behavioral tendencies. Instead, a sophisticated mix of the role of metaphor and statistical assertions often forms the basis for making decisions.

The article offers an additional perspective upon which people deal with complex problems. The concept of lexical framework appears to form the basis of emphasizing metaphor usage. For instance, the terms beast and virus are associated with known elements that are detrimental to human well-being. By their infamous earthly attribution, a scenario associated with the terms will gain prejudice. Lexical Framework amplifies the effect of the metaphor pushing people to make covert decisions. Apart from the lexical structure, there are no alternative solutions offered to justify methods that people use in dealing with complex behavioral patterns.

The readings provided a new perspective citing the value of literal discourse in evaluating people’s choices. However, it did not emphasize the known truths. People's decisions emanate from an essentialist or social constructionist viewpoint, which means that an individual would pursue an action based on their innate character traits or from the idealized social world.

The known truth is that essentialists would not focus on metaphor or numerical figures in making decisions (Vibert, 2004). Instead, their inherent behavioral trends will push their thoughts to align toward certain decisions. Similarly, social constructionists will appreciate that human beings are in a constant mode of interaction; hence copying or imitating characters from others. Therefore, if society perceives a crime as ghastly, the social constructionist will make a similar decision.
In conclusion, the role of metaphor in reason contributes to a minute fraction of the guiding principles in disseminating a rationale for choices and actions. It would not suffice to rely, purely, on logic or literal discourse in evaluating people's decisions.