This paper will explore the peculiarities of the Canadian society in terms of labor market as they were reflected in the live of the author and utilize several theories to gain a proper understanding of them.
To begin with, it may be logical to engage the ideas that were expressed by Karl Marx with regard to social structure. According to him, the social environment is in the constant state of conflict between the two classes: the one that works and the other that makes the former work (Bartos, 2002, p. 38). Since the latter are greatly outnumbered by the former, it is obvious that the class of exploiters will make the social mobility impossible and tighten their control over the working class. In spite of the fact that the significance of this theory is widely acknowledged, the author might note that it may not be suitable for describing his situation. Thus, he belongs to the middle class which is located in the middle of the social ladder which means that such an approach towards treating the contemporary Canadian society is not suitable.
There is another theory that should be engaged. It was developed by Emil Durkheim and makes an essential difference between organic and mechanical solidarity that can be witnessed within the society. Keeping in mind these two terms, the author acknowledges that the social environment of Canada possesses features of organic solidarity all labor of different people is harmonized and ultimately leads to a positive consequence for the entire population (Slattery, 2003, p. 77). In other words, there is a tremendous diversity in labor which ensures its division and provides people with the ability to choose the career that fits one the best.
The last theory that will be engaged in the course of the discussion is the one which was proposed by Max Weber. This scholar argued that the social life is largely shaped by bureaucracy which creates some sort of an iron cage to give one’s life meaning (Swedberg & Agevall, 2005, p.