Everybody dreams of a perfectly safe world to live in, a world free from suffering and harm inflicted by the many violent acts of man against each other. The road to freedom from violence and crime still travels a rough and tough path since the start of civilization. The question still remains until now if are we living against a violent world or has the world changed to a safe place to live in? Today people are aware of the violence around the community through the many forms of news expressed in tabloids, media and even the internet. Every time people open the television for news, most often headlines always comprises of crimes and violence such as killings in many forms. Or when people reads newspapers there has been no newspaper published in the history of publications that does not contain crime against people such as robbery. Not to mention the vast information loaded in the internet with sites, blogs and addresses that explicitly spreads the presence of violence and crime such as rape and homicide.The world indeed is as always a wonderful complicated place to live in. Many efforts have been exerted to make living among the human populace as peaceful and harmonious as ever despite the differences in culture and beliefs. But somehow those efforts made to secure the environment have evolved and indeed the world we have now is so far the greatest violence-fighting-society man has become. Equal laws were promulgated and are implemented among the society that ensures penalty that would suffice a violation made against the law and the lawful right of another person. And to better understand the nature of these hostile unnatural acts of man, that have violated the rights of many people, is to go over not just by definition but to go thru various studies made. To go over the complexities of violent crime is to understand the way it should be treated and prevented as well as if time and chances permit that it happens to a person, his knowledge about crimes could be the best defense. Violent crimes are violations of criminal law that involves the unintentional use of violence by one person against another. Criminologists favor narrow definitions of violence focusing on physical harm or threats. Another definition of violence according to the National Research Council is that these are behaviors by individuals that intentionally threaten, attempt, or inflict physical harm on others (Rosenfeld 2010). This definition includes a wide array of behaviors including homicide, assault, robbery, rape, torture and capital punishment but it excludes many acts that are encompassed by other reasonable definitions (Rosenfeld 2012). Although many authors sought to define violent crimes in many context somehow the definition encompasses the same definition if all summed up together. In that similar note, in the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, violent crime is composed of four offenses: murder and non negligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. According to this UCR, violent crimes as those offenses which involve the use of force or threat of force in
Cite this document
(“Differential Association Theory: Defining the root of violent crimes Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/sociology/8188-differential-association-theory-defining-the-root-of-violent-crimes
(Differential Association Theory: Defining the Root of Violent Crimes Essay)
“Differential Association Theory: Defining the Root of Violent Crimes Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/sociology/8188-differential-association-theory-defining-the-root-of-violent-crimes.
Cited: 0 times
The complexities of the society over the years paved way for social problems such as crimes and violence in the community. This study opted to explain violent crimes by going through the complexities of the definition and going through a theory that defines the mere presence of such social deviances…
That is because this particular sector of our society has always found itself in a predicament. The parents are illegal immigrants so they must be forced out of the United States. However, there are those of them who use the fact that their children are born on American soil as the main reason that they feel they should not be deported.
What are some of the ramifications that can impact the psychic of the community and public perception on the acts in which these criminals conduct their predatory actions? The perceptions of the public can be largely shaped up by how sexual offenders make use of crime-switching and specialization tactics.
Scientific studies that examine the causes, extent, prevention or control of crime are covered under the broad field of criminology which is a discipline of behavioral sciences that draws upon the research conducted by sociologists. Such researches often provide theories of crime that may be applied to different circumstances of crime.
Assumptions address debates on contentious matters such as conflict against consensus, or determinism against free will. Through these, theories of crime primarily simplify the study of reasons and causes of crime and occasionally address the stakeholders in the criminal justice system including offenders, victims, correctional institutions and the police.
Juvenile delinquency emerged several decades away, and brought about the reality that adolescents could commit serious offenses such as murder and robbery with violence. Although the increase in juvenile delinquency reflected negatively on the morality of the society, it placed the justice system in a dilemma.
At first, white-collar criminals were identified as middle-to upper-income people with high and trusted status within a company. White-collar crimes were usually identified as embezzlement, fee splitting, forgery and other nonviolent crimes involving currency or tangible assets.
During Palaeolithic and Neolithic eras, crimes are stated to be limited in number and less grave in intensity. Constant increase in population led to the transforming of small tribes and communities into big social setups. Subsequently,
?? Marquise Elkins’s murder case, the defense counsel argued that the 17-year-old suspect was too young to face the death penalty under Georgia law after the jury convicted the juvenile of murder at that age (“Associated Press” 1). Indeed, in most cases the defense of the