One needs to tell them poverty prevails mostly in those countries which have formulated policies discouraging the globalization. In the above statements author tends to prove that it is only the lack of globalization in terms of trade that has caused poverty. The author has neglected many other factors like availability of natural resources, knowledge and technological development. Likewise we can take an example of trade between Somalia and USA. In such a trade USA definitely would be the one gaining more benefits. What Somalia has to trade with USA? Therefore trade is beneficial where exchange takes place and both the parties are in a win-win situation. On another place writer states that “it is generally believed that developed and rich countries have forced the under developed countries to withdraw their trade barriers. While they themselves have kept their own barriers intact making it impossible for underdeveloped countries to trade with, in actual international trading policies are similar for all”. While commenting like above the author has adopted a very bookish approach and put the reality behind the curtains. The fact cannot be denied that the developed and rich countries have influence over the policies of poor and underdeveloped countries. Furthermore it is stated in the article that “the trade barriers kept by underdeveloped countries against each others are the most significant hindrances to their development”. Above statement seems to be justified because imposing trade barriers against one another makes it difficult for all the underdeveloped countries to trade with each other. Such a policy needs a revision by the governments of those countries. International bodies like World Bank, IMF, and uno may also intervene in this regard. Moreover, the writer has criticized the leaders of some underdeveloped countries who justify the barriers by the developed countries and keep relaxing their own trade barriers. The above criticism also seems to be justified because by this only developed countries get benefit. In the last lines of second paragraph article states that with such an international trade everyone would benefit but the more interesting fact is that what these some ships will do when more than 2 trillion dollars of donation to Africa and Asia by USA and Europe could not do anything. The world needs to think about these last lines and should work on it collectively, if it really is interested in elimination of poverty. On one place the author has supported the bringing of foreign direct investment in developing countries. For this article states that, It is generally believed that if unnecessary protections set by the government are removed and corporations like multinationals are invited to invest in the country and act freely, this would not only strengthens the economy but also the social and environmental developments in the country. It is therefore most of the countries formulate especial and relaxing policies for foreign direct investment. Above words are based on the reality and reflects the practical approach of the author. Furthermore article discusses the analysis by different analysts about the operations of multinationals in the country. For this it is stated that many people argue that labour class especially in
Cite this document
(“Globalization - Good or Bad Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/sociology/8479-critical-review
(Globalization - Good or Bad Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Globalization - Good or Bad Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/sociology/8479-critical-review.
Cited: 0 times
A CRITICAL REVIEW OF GLOBALIZATION: GOOD OR BAD The article is about merits and demerits of globalization. On the whole the author has supported globalization and put an emphasis on the merits of globalization like on one place the author states that it is the globalization that has helped to overcome the acute poverty and income inequalities prevailing in the world since last two decades…
The author of the article “Globalization - good or bad?” under review has highlighted the main reasons why globalization is a good thing that should be embraced by all nations. China and India have been cited as classical examples of how globalization can help transform the livelihoods of poor citizens and make them climb the social ladder into the middle class.
The researcher states that many factors, such as advancement in transport and modes of communication, virtual organizations made possible today because of internet and various other technological factors leading to network societies, that have helped replace post modernism with globalization in business, cultures and societies.
Globalization, Its Significance to Challenges of Development and Key Debates. Globalization and related development were considered as the wave of the future when they first appeared to unite countries into one global economy for the mutual benefits, which presumed global integration and interdependence in the technological, economic, social, cultural, ecological and political spheres.
First of all, we had slavery, in the ancient years in many parts of Europe, something that continued over centuries, until the feudal society in the Middle Age, then with French Revolution in 1789, we see the civil class arising, against poor proletarians, until nowadays, when feudalism already disappeared, civil class and proletarians are fighting against each other, for survival and better life conditions, from the side of proletariat.
These not only helped in a better understanding of human nature regarding the environment, but also helped a lot in improving the social cooperation offered by individuals of different backgrounds. By constructing some ideologies and theories, sociologists have become able to derive a model for a better human being to handle with every aspect of life.
In this case, the author argues that it is the role of the managers to come with strategies that will be practical in the successful running of the business (Chapter 1). First, Rumelt indicates that the managers need to identify the nature of challenges facing the business so as to handle them effectively (Chapter 3).
In this essay I use empirical data to explore, with reference to the works of Piere Bourdieu's Distinction: A social critique of the Judgement of Taste (1984) and Georg Simmel Philosophical Culture (1911), why in our postmodern society it does makes sense to discuss fashion in terms of good and bad taste.
The establishment of free trade has been compared to the improvement of farming equipment and factories, which made many jobs obsolete and caused economic upheaval while being implemented, but ultimately was deemed an
ch as advancement in transport and modes of communication, virtual organizations made possible because of internet and various other factors leading to network societies have helped replace post modernism with globalization.
According to Castells the network society is the new
At this point, it is necessary to ponder on this question; would the existence of sweatshops result in more harm than the harm that would result from the closure of all sweatshops globally? In this respect, this discussion holds the argument that sweatshops are good.
3 pages (750 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Globalization - Good or Bad for FREE!