This is so because criminal Law looks at punishment of the offender rather than civil law remedy of compensation. As a general rule of criminal practice, every offender enjoys a right to a fair hearing encompassed in the cherished due process of law. To this effect, when a person is prosecuted under common law for countries like USA and Nigeria, the prosecution is under obligation to establish a premafacie case at preliminary trials. Once the premafacie case has been established, then the court will place the accused person on his or her defence such that he or she is not punished unheard as guaranteed under their respective Constitutions and Penal Laws giving a right to a fair hearing (due process of law). This means that the accused person is allowed to raise defenses available to his or her crime which is relevant and applicable to that jurisdiction. Examples of defenses include mistake of fact, provocation, self defense, automatism, diminished responsibility among others. Notable though is the fact that Saudi Arabia uniquely applies “Shari’ah principles, as derived from the Qur’an and Sunnah and state promulgated laws that do not contradict the provisions of the Qur’an and Sunnah.” Comparatively, some common law defenses applicable in USA and Nigeria do not apply to Sharia criminal system as herein discussed. Adherence to a fair hearing is respected in all countries. However, there is no need of establishing a premafacie case in Saudi Arabia. Once charged, you are tried directly and both parties are given a right to present their cases. Therefore, the accused is by all means expected to defend himself or herself unlike in common law jurisdiction where the accused will raise defenses upon establishing a case to answer. That being said, the author also examines the criminal Law specialized Court system in USA, Nigeria and Saudi Arabia. The writer observes that both Nigeria and United States have specialized state and federal Courts that autonomously share jurisdiction in all criminal matters. But Nigeria has extra customary and Sharia law Court. The Nigerian sharia Courts are similar to that of Saudi Arabia. Federal Courts normally deals with interstate criminal trials whereas state Courts deals with state criminal trials. Saudi Arabia does not have federal Court structure but her Court system is collected from a combination of “Supreme Judicial Council, Courts of Appeals, and First-Instance Courts (General Courts and Summary Courts).” One unique feature is that ll countries have specialized Courts for criminal Proceeding as explained above with Supreme Court and Supreme Judicial Council as the Highest Courts of criminal Appeal for United States of America, Nigeria and Saudi Arabia respectively. They all have structures closer to people from local jurisdictions to the highest appellate Court as seen above. However, the big difference lies in the administration of criminal law justice system lies in a sense that Saudi Arabia system is designed typically according to sharia Law and there is no federalism of any sort as it is America and Nigeria. This also applies to Nigeria where similar sharia Law Court system is applied in Predominantly Islamic Northern states. However, Nigeria and Saudi Arabia differ on federal, customary and Magistrate Courts. Notable though is
Cite this document
(“Term paper for criminal justice class Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/sociology/90521-term-paper-for-criminal-justice-class
(Term Paper for Criminal Justice Class Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3750 Words)
“Term Paper for Criminal Justice Class Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/sociology/90521-term-paper-for-criminal-justice-class.
Cited: 0 times
A Comparison of Criminal defenses and Specialized Courts In The United States, Nigeria and Saudi Arabia Name: Course no: Subject: Sociology Date: April, 2013 Introduction In this paper, the researcher analyzes two categorical topics; that is, a comparison of criminal law defenses in United States (USA), Nigeria and Saudi Arabia and the specialized Criminal Court system…
Domestic violence is defined in relation to relationships (Harvey, 2010). It is considered a behavior that is abusive in any given relationship. It normally occurs when one partner in a relationship tries to take control over the other partner. Domestic violence can happen to any one regardless of employment, education, culture, religion, sex, age, or even the marital status.
The type and extent to which the victims suffer injury is one of the considerations, for the sake of the definition. The degree and nature of the victims connection to the acts of the offender is yet another consideration (Andrew, 15). In law also, the definition of a victim also depends on whether the victim was at fault at the time the offense leading to his injury occurred.
According to Victor (2008), juveniles are using crime to satisfy their immediate needs. An example of such a case is Juan, a teenager in California who opts to engage in crime when rebelling against the authorities. The offender resorted to crime instead of using ethical means in solving his challenges.
Juvenile crimes, grouped into the wide scope of juvenile delinquencies, are those committed by persons below the age of 18, legally known as minors. Necessarily, because of the age factor, juvenile crimes are addressed separately in the justice system, although the crimes are of the same nature committed by adults (Griffin, 2003).
Remarkably, these actions gave them prominence in the society. The uncanny nature of this family, which makes the family name “White” ironic makes their case a source of interest in the sociological context. Some important concerns involve the interest to understand why this family behaves the way they do, and why almost all of the members conduct themselves in a similar way or pattern.
However, the foundations of plea bargaining are a throwback to the adversarial system of justice, whereby the main function of the system trial is to identify the material truth and ascertaining which contesting party can offer a better case. Pleas are supposed to be tendered during trials not to be rewarded but to as part of the procedural system.
The U.S. does not have any regulation or law that forbids the police and investigators from making misleading statements, deceiving the suspects on the strength of their case, or lying that they have a witness who saw the suspect committing the crime. This paper aims at analyzing the use of deception by police officers and investigators during interrogation.
On the other hand, Boone County musicians saw them as rebels who have either psychological problems or socio-economic issues (Doering & Nitzberg, 2009). This paper analyzes the case of the Whites in the documentary film The Wild and Wonderful Whites of West Virginia, produced by Doering and directed by Nitzberg (2009).
The US justice system has already addressed this problem like in almost every nation around the world by imposing stiffer penalties, which include death penalty or capital punishment in order to prevent the
One of the constitutional violations represented in the movie is bribing aspect of the former Luzerne County Judge by the name Mark Ciavarella Jr. Bribery is unconstitutional and hence the judge violated constitution by accepting bribes (Ecenbarger 4).
The judge also
1 pages (250 words)Term Paper
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Term Paper on topic Term paper for criminal justice class for FREE!