But as civilization has progressed, modern societies are reasonably well-equipped in regulating nature and offering protection from its extremes. Therefore, there is no longer any necessity to hold on to blind faith as a source of consolation in a brutish world. If I was invited to a public debate on the conflict between religious fundamentalism and the methods of science, I would strongly defend science and its centrality to civil discourse. The rest of this essay is an elaboration of this position. Richard Dawkins has been an inspirational public figure since the 1970s. With his ground-breaking work The Selfish Gene, Dawkins brought irrefutable evidence and importance to Darwin’s Theory of Evolution through Natural Selection. All along he has contrasted the simplifying beauty of scientific rationality to that of mystifying and mythologizing tendency of religions. One of his later works The God Delusion is an extensive treatise on this debate. In it, Dawkins rebukes and rebuts several of illogical assumptions and false inferences made by proponents of major religions. Taking a polemical approach to erasing the God delusion, Dawkins quotes copiously from canonized religious scriptures and systematically exposes their inconsistencies, logical fallacies and contradictions. I strongly side with Dawkins and his brand of atheism which issues a clarion call to people to embrace science. What Dawkins is actually encouraging is to look and admire the beauty and complexity of our cosmos and the life forms within it. Therein lay the most intricate, the most delicate, the most wondrous of nature’s beauty and order. To Dawkins’ defence are several leading scientists of the day. Steven Weinberg, for example, has written a detailed defence of the contents of The God Delusion in his article for the Times Literary Supplement dated 17th January 2007. Weinberg offers a historical perspective on the conflict between religious fundamentalism and scientific advancement. And in each of these conflicts, religion either rejects, modifies or misinterprets scientific fact to suit its ends. One of the classic instances was the controversy surrounding the Copernican understanding of the cosmos – which put the Sun and not the Earth at the centre of the cosmos. The Church got threatened by this theory which went against the geo-centric view noted in the holy texts. Likewise, Newton’s discovery of gravitational force upset the Church, for it dispelled the myth that it was God’s will that kept the universe in proper order. But each time, there is only so much resistance religious institutions can create in the light of overwhelming scientific evidence. Hence, eventually many theologians accepted the helio-centric view of the immediate Universe and the existence of gravitational force regulating heavenly bodies. Herein lies a message to religious fundamentalists of today. Just as preceding generations of literal interpreters of scriptures eventually realized their folly, so too will the current generation come to realize its ignorance soon. This will be one of my key messages to religious fundamentalists in this important public debate. Even the popular astrophysicist Stephen Hawking has come strongly in support of methods of science. Though he was believed to be a
Cite this document
(“Suppose you have been invited to a public debate on the conflict Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/sociology/94572-suppose-you-have-been-invited-to-a-public-debate
(Suppose You Have Been Invited to a Public Debate on the Conflict Essay)
“Suppose You Have Been Invited to a Public Debate on the Conflict Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/sociology/94572-suppose-you-have-been-invited-to-a-public-debate.
Cited: 0 times
Suppose you have been invited to a public debate on the conflict between religious fundamentalism and the methods of science. What would you want to say? Ever since the ushering of the Enlightenment in the early 18th century, religious dogma has increasingly been questioned…
Generally, science is understood as the study of empirically observable things in the world, while religion entails mainly to what is unobservable and immaterial and they cannot be detected by senses (Harrison, 2010). All arguments and evidence on these two subjects have shown that there is a very strong rivalry between them.
Although each country has its own social, cultural and economical frameworks, governments of all countries are confronted with basic challenges that involve ethics in public services. The strategies implemented by governments for ethical purpose very often contain common characteristics.
While such a classification may be true in very general terms (Public Divided on Origins of Life, 2005: 2), the issue is much more complicated. Indeed, as pointed out by Ruse, the converse relationships exist in a great many cases; more specifically, there are those whom profess a simultaneous religious faith and a belief in evolution along with those whom profess no religious faith and yet believe in certain tenets of creationism (2007: n.p.).
A Partnership is where two or more persons come together to do a business. Each partner will put in assets to be used by the Business. Such assets will still be owned directly by the partners. Profits and losses will be shared in
Capital Punishment, Gun Ownership, Police Pursuit, and Hate Crime are discussed. It is supposed that the State is able to enforce law, but that the law so enforced must be for the benefit both of the society
Hence, between the eras that marked the decline of the Roman Empire and the beginning of the Renaissance, religion found itself struggling from keeping the sacred identity established through the former grounds which occurred to have strengthened Europe
of the universe, even if our universe is a piece of a multiverse, the multiverse itself might need to have an outright starting and speculative cosmologies attempt to test the Big Bang hypothesis, however none of them – regardless of the possibility that correct – can build
4 pages (1000 words)Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Suppose you have been invited to a public debate on the conflict between religious fundamentals and the methods of science. What for FREE!