However, the punishment is applied on a trivial number of cases where it has been made compulsory. The punishment is irregularly and unfairly applied. In a country of over 200 people, the Justice Brennan observed that it was applied less than fifty people. As a result, the practice was perceived to be unconstitutional and prejudicial in the circumstances (Bigel, 59). The Justice concluded that the state is expected to confine the convicts in prison rather than kill them arbitrarily. The application of death penalty for the mentally retarded was considered to be unfair and cruel by the eight amendments. According to Justice Brennan, death treats members of human race in an inhumane manner (Bigel, 51). Capital punishment suggests that human beings can be used and discarded at will. In the Gregg v. Georgia case, it was observed that death in inconsistent with human rights. Justice William Brennan observed that even the vilest criminals were entitled to human rights and human dignity. Civilized treatment of human beings demands that the ultimate fate of a human being should not be made subject to human judgment (Bigel, 19). According to the premise of 8th amendment, the death penalty violates the premise of civilized treatment as guaranteed in the clause. According to Brennan, death penalty is cruel and should be classified as unusual form of punishment because it is prohibited by the clause. This formed the basis for stating that death punishment violates 8th and 14th amendment. According to Justice John Roberts, in the Baze verses Rees case, the pain experienced in the process of execution does not constitute unusual or cruel death. He argues that the pain is objectively tolerable risk. Justice john Roberts argued that punishment through execution was the most human method known in Kentucky and many other states. He disagreed with the notion that death penalty is a violation of 8th amendment because is cannot be perceived to be probative with regard to careless killing or infliction of pain (Bigel, 31). He acknowledged that the society is moving towards more humane forms of capital punishment. Death punishment challenges the evolving standards of human decency. The state is limited when it come to power over human life. According to Justice Potter Stewart, death punishment has a strong history of acceptance and is expected to apply to death row conflicts (Bigel, 39). The arguments against executions are challenged as emotional and unbalanced. Chief Justice Warren in the case of Trop verses Dulles argued that capital punishment does not violate the concept of cruelty as defined by the constitution in the United States. He argued that the punishment is imposed according to the enormity of the crimes or crime committed. The traditional penalties need to be observed and appreciated according to the law. The chief justice urged the legal fraternity to draw a demarcation through the 8th amendment to deal with the evolving decency standards that are expected to mark a shift of societal perception. However, he suggested that it may not be appropriate to dismiss death penalty in entirety. Capital punishment is said to enhance deterrence. Deterrence is the belief that the severity of a crime can discourage the members of the society from performing criminal acts. It has been argued that capital punishment is known to cause increased violence rather than reduce it (Bigel, 59). This is referred to as
Cite this document
(“Cruel and Unusual. The End of the Eighth Amendment Dissertation - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/sociology/99087-cruel-and-unusual-the-end-of-the-eighth-amendment
(Cruel and Unusual. The End of the Eighth Amendment Dissertation - 1)
“Cruel and Unusual. The End of the Eighth Amendment Dissertation - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/sociology/99087-cruel-and-unusual-the-end-of-the-eighth-amendment.
Cited: 0 times
Subject: Cruel and Unusual: The End of the Eighth Amendment Justice Brennan found that death penalty is unconstitutional. In Justice William Brennan’s words, capital punishment was “irrational, arbitrary and degrading to human dignity…
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page number Abstract 2 Chapter One: Introduction Background of the Study Problem Statement Research Questions Research Objectives Significance of the Study Scope and Limitations Methodology: A Brief Overview Organizations of the Study 3 Chapter Two: Literature Review Introduction Historical Background of the U.S.-Cuba Foreign Policy The Current Status of the U.S.-Cuba Foreign Policy Factors that affect the U.S.-Cuba Foreign Policy The Future of the U.S.-Cuba Foreign Policy 9 Chapter Three: Results 28 Chapter Four: Discussions 37 Chapter Five: Conclusions and Recommendations 42 Abstract The relationship between the United States and Cuba has been the subject of many researche
As a result, the sustainable housing policies sought would help ensure that houses built are ideal, comfortable and eco-friendly. Besides known stakeholders in the construction industry such as construction companies,
The paper tells that the idea behind the ticking bomb scenario is to brain storm on the methods of torture adopted inflicted upon suspects by the law enforcing agencies of the country to extract information irrespective of the matter whether such acts have valid justification and legality. Every one of us knows that torture in any form or shape is prohibited under local law / international law in most of the countries around the globe.
In particular, the literature review examines companies and their practices which can be considered to be socially responsible, because animal testing would be under the rubric of social responsibility. Another broad rubric under which animal testing falls is that of animal rights, so the animal rights movement is also examined in-depth in the literature review section.
This literature review would need to take stock of the present status of the right to remain silent and would also seek to critically examine the recent changes in the law with regard to the privilege to remain silent and would also endeavour to assess the value of the rule.
In Islam, bioethical decision-making is based on a framework of values derived from the interpretation of Islamic law that is intimately linked to the broad ethical teachings of the Qur’an and the tradition of the Prophet Muhammad. Islam has the flexibility to respond to new biomedical advances and practices.
After it was demutualised in the year 1997, Northern Rock started growing rapidly in order to become the fifth largest mortgage lender of UK. The aggressive expansion of Northern Rock was funded by heavy reliance on unsecured and secured borrowings. Moreover in the year 2006 it entered in to subprime lending by entering into a deal with Lehman Brother.
It condemns the inhuman and unethical persecutions on the slaves captured. Precisely, evidences reveal that torture was beyond imagination as they were wounded both physically and mentally. Hence, the Amendment states “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” (as qtd in Dayan).
This research paper shows that independence has been examined as "an intensely felt professional philosophy". It is supposed that part of the solution in deciphering ethical impasses regarding potential and identified risks to assessor independence is to put more stress on professional beliefs.
According to the report Fundamental Rights of EU Law fundamental rights had been traced to several ancient documents which dates signify that even in those ancient eras fundamental rights had already been practiced and recognised and that the concept was alive and respect for such rights existed thousands of years ago.
66 pages (16500 words)Dissertation
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Dissertation on topic Cruel and Unusual. The End of the Eighth Amendment for FREE!