PhD Psychology: Theretical Framework Versus. Conceptual Framework - Coursework Example

Psychology: Theoretical Framework v. Conceptual Framework Theoretical Framework v. Conceptual Framework Conceptual framework refers to a state where the researching entity provides a comprehensive direction through which a specific survey should be carried out. Statistically, conceptual frameworks outline the relationship that exists between specific variables within the study and provides an idea of the entire investigation process including the expected output (Fortune, 2015). A theoretical framework on the other hand is not precise, but guides the research on a general basis and at the same time defines the variables to be measured and the statistical relations to be examined (Reith, 2014).

Going through the article, it is apparent that the author employed conceptual framework while carrying out the study. This is because in the introduction, the author documents psychology, counselling, and psychoanalysis as some of the disciplines upon which the conceptual framework of the research was drawn (Clarkson, 1996). Similarly, the researcher had an all-inclusive dimension that the survey was to take, a distinctive trait that is routinely associated with conceptual frameworks (De-vos, 2014).

This is corroborated when the researcher outlines some of the objectives that the study was to explore as well as the methodology of the investigation. Conceptual framework is the ideal choice for the study, as it aided the researcher to observe the phenomena of interest more precisely (Kirshner, 2014). Consequently, the researcher was in a position to detect some aspects that would not have been apparent. In as much as the research had its set border, the use of conceptual framework has since highlighted the need to carry out further research on issues related to the phenomena of interest.

This is validated when the author outlines some of the areas that need supplementary scrutiny.References Clarkson, P. (1996). Researching the therapeutic relationship in psychoanalysis, counselling psychology and psychotherapy qualitative inquiry. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 9(2), 143-163.De-vos, J. (2014). Which materialism? Questioning the matrix of psychology, neurology, psychoanalysis, and ideology critique. Theory and Psychology. Vol. 24(1) 76–92. DOI: 10.1177/0959354313516394.

Fortune, C. (2015). Thwarting the psychoanalytic detectives: defending the Severn legacy. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis 75, 19–28. doi:10.1057/ajp.2014.55.Kirshner, L. (2014, September). The translational metaphor in psychoanalysis. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis. DOI: 10.1111/1745-8315.1224. Reith, B. (2014, October). The first interview: Anxieties and research on initiating psychoanalysis. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis. DOI: 10.1111/1745- 8315.12203.