This research will be used to substantiate the need for an ethical framework in regards to the specific area of computerized invasion of privacy and the legal ramifications of this. Through literary means, this paper sets out to implement and develop this idea for improved ethics in computer technology with regard to individual privacy…
What needs to be specifically addressed is the right to individual privacy in computer technology. Every human being is entitled to be assured their personal information is safe and solely confidential, at all times on the internet. Furthermore there are many bills that have been passed and laws made (old and new) to assist in the efforts to make sure these ethical concerns stay steered on the correct path but sometimes issues do arise ( "Using Global Liberty Campaign" 2005).
1There must also always be acknowledgement with regard to the rights of an individuals' personal history. What must be understood is the fact that no one's identifiable history can legally be passed through the net without consent from that specific individual. This must come as either a hand signed statement or it can also be verbal approval or an electronic signature but it must always be one out of those three. As long as these steps are taken then there would not be a reason for a feeling of deception or of having an invasion of privacy invoked upon the person. There are so many wonderful points to the internet and sharing of information. However, it is this same capability of being able to utilize shared information that can demean and invade another's right to computerized privacy.
Cite this document
(“Ethical Framework: Computerized Invasion of Privacy Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/technology/281397-ethical-framework-computerized-invasion-of-privacy
(Ethical Framework: Computerized Invasion of Privacy Essay)
“Ethical Framework: Computerized Invasion of Privacy Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/technology/281397-ethical-framework-computerized-invasion-of-privacy.
Invasion of privacy has become a huge problem because it creates rifts among the people who are directly involved with the use of sensitive data and information, as they believe that their rights have been transgressed upon and such violations usually mean that they would have to find new ways to protect themselves.
Through using such cameras, it becomes easy to monitor the driver’s adherence to traffic rules, leading to enhanced safety. However, many drivers have raised concerns about the cameras, arguing that their use infringes on the human rights to privacy. In this regard, the essay presents an analysis on whether the traffic cameras are seen to infringe on one’s privacy or a source of protection from the unruly drivers.
In other words, only when rights to privacy as provided for under Article 8 of ECHR and the Data Protection Right are infringed will the claimant have a right claim for invasion of privacy. Remedies for invasion of privacy are therefore limited to informational privacy against private parties and broadly against public authorities.
The current technologies comprise of computers, spectrographs, video lens and transmitters. A significant substance obtained is personal data. During 1928, US’ Supreme Court Judge Brandeis wrote that invention and discovery have rendered it conceivable for the authorities, by techniques far more effectual than stretching on the rack to acquire disclosure in a law court of what is hissed within the closet.
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is an instrumental need for everyone in regards to gathering of information and knowledge. Step should be taken so that it can be guaranteed as a basic right to for everyone.
randeis (1856 – 1941) (who was to become a justice of the United states Supreme Court), who had been the first-place student in the same generation, decided to publish an article arguing for a right of privacy. (www.bigsiteofamazingfacts.com) Their article "A Right to
Privacy laws in the United States have their origins in the British common law, which protected individuals from only the interference with their lives and with their property. This came to be further developed in
The ethical actor that will be used for the test here is Facebook itself. It is not clear whether it was just exercising its rights to amend the SRR by acting as a private company or whether it was acting unethically by misleading users about the security of the