It is in the first meeting with Galvin and the Bishop (who by way of his position as the head of the archdiocese, heads the hospital that mis-treated Kaye; the hospital is run by the archdiocese) that the audience clearly realizes that the major theme of the story is going to be what to choose- the so called greater good or the ethically, morally and politically right position. It is through the transformation of Galvin that this philosophical conflict unfolds. Galvin goes in to meet the Bishop with an inclination to get some compensatory amount for his client and through that acquire himself a decent commission on that. But even at that moment, it can be seen that the question that Dr. Gruber (the doctor who wanted to testify in favor of Kaye) had asked him was haunting him. After telling Galvin that he wanted to testify because he wanted “to do right”, Gruber had asked him, “Isn’t that why you’re doing it?”. This simple question was actually a leading question into the contradiction involved in making certain moral choices out of selfish motives or out of convenience. When the Bishop starts speaking to Galvin in their meeting next day, Galvin suddenly finds himself before the reality of the situation. The Bishop is seeking to settle the matter outside the court by giving compensation to Kaye, which he justifies in the greater good of preserving the reputation of his hospital. Two questions that Galvin asks are the keys to challenging the very notion of such a greater good as is presented by the Bishop. The first question is, “How did you settle on the amount?”, which actually is a pointer to the truth that nobody has the moral right to put a price on the life of a human being. The second question, though directly asked in the text, can be framed from the logic of the total situation as, ‘is it morally right to suppress truth?’, the truth being that a woman was killed by a mistake made by two doctors. There are several aspects of the story that has to be considered when the contradiction between the ‘greater good’ proposed by the Bishop and the pure moral truth or ‘good’ that is upheld by Galvin is examined. These aspects can be, 1) it is a Christian religious head who is proposing such a solution. But Christianity is a religion that claims to be morally upright and humane; 2) It is a Bishop who is expected to stand up for all such values, who is making this proposition; 3) what is being fashioned by the Bishop as greater good will actually subvert an existing legal system,
Cite this document
(“The Verdict screen-play Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/visual-arts-film-studies/36809-the-verdict-screen-play
(The Verdict Screen-Play Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“The Verdict Screen-Play Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/visual-arts-film-studies/36809-the-verdict-screen-play.
Cited: 0 times
Sacrifice for the greater good is a concept that has emerged through centuries of human history. Any investigation of it from the contemporary realities cannot forget to take into account the statement of Umberto Eco (2001), “At times ethics itself can accept exceptions to the prohibition on killing, just as the collective sensibility can accept horrors and sacrifices that guarantee a greater good” (p.6)…
It increases tonicity, improves emotional and physical health. Play has a therapeutic effect, eliminates psychological traumas, allowing living through traumatic life experiences easier. Play was initially viewed as a method of children’s treatment in the 1920s by such therapists as A.
Attempts to define play by theorists settles that play is unaccountable activity that one does for fun. Children, for instance, take play has a serious activity whereas the elderly engage in play not as often as the children do. Many scholars and educators believe that play is very important to the growth of children, and this is no less important than reading, writing, and doing arithmetic training.
Play is normally considered to be an act of involving in something that is not real. Play is thought to be a ritualized behavior that permits a performance. Play is normally characterized by factors such as; jokes, flirtatious smiles, or wise cracks. Play can normally involve a change in mood, an eruption of liberty or it may involve activities.
Exercises in both adults and children have been proved to reduce cases of psychological problems such as depressions, and anxiety, resulting in increased psychological benefits. Paly can, therefore, be used as a versatile tool to self-regulate moods with better outcomes compared to any other mood enhancing methods.
From this paper, it is clear that there are viewers who will indicate that the movie enhanced their understanding of the novel. Nonetheless, the perspective an individual takes depends on their preferences since movies are a visual medium and movie directors’ attempts in portraying written pieces, thoughts, and events might be challenging.
In the beginning of the play, it is discernable that Oedipus was never morally perverted. As a matter of fact, it is agreeable that Oedipus was a man driven by high moral standards. Moreover, it was his moral standard that
He looks around to take notice of anything unusual in the surrounding. Heavy rain and dark night obscure the visibility; yet he continues to look around himself. He rushes towards one side of the casino, trying to appear calm; yes