They even had a great deal of say in the political sector of USA. Their political power was due to a fact that had been narrated by the CBC News article in the following words: “The L.A. Times recently calculated that since 1990, the auto industry as a whole has donated $100 million US to Republicans and $34 million to Democrats.” From the year 1951 to the year 2007 Ford had been ranked third in all the automotive manufacturers of the world. After maintaining this position for fifty six years the company lost its position worldwide. It, however, still remained at third position in the US auto industry. The recent times have however depicted a recession of Ford and GM in their native country’s automobile industry. This recession has given space to foreign automobile manufacturers to establish their position by introducing their models in the industry. Currently these foreign automotive industrialists are leading the industry. BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM. Ford and GM were the largest vehicle producing giants in USA once. They assisted their country’s economy massively by producing generous revenue and benefit packages for labor. Ford and GM held their importance in the US automobile industry not only because of their size but also because of their business volume. Their loosing of their stature, however, was owing to a number of reasons. Those reasons can be summarized as follows: This meant that a major number of operations in them were distributed into unions or rather termed as being “Unionized”. This led to a rising labor cost that incurred to these industrial giants. The labor costs of their international emerging counterparts were however very less as they did not practice unionization. Even the counterparts that had their manufacturing units in the US did not face the said problem. (Van Praet, 2008). WHY THE RECESSION? A number of issues led to the downfall of Ford and GM along with other US automobile manufacturers. Quality Compromised Among various issues was that of the maintenance of Quality by these giants. Stephen Robbins (2009) mentions their carelessness and compromise in the maintenance of their products in his book ‘Management’ in the following words: “U.S. car industry is often used as a classic example of what can go wrong when managers focus solely on trying to keep costs down. In the late 1970s, GM, Ford, and Chrysler built products that many consumers rejected...... When the costs of rejects, repairing shoddy work, product recalls, and expensive controls to identify quality problems were considered, U.S. manufacturers actually were less productive than many foreign competitors. The Japanese demonstrated that it was possible for the highest-quality manufacturers to be among the lowest-cost producers. American manufacturers in the car and other industries soon realized the importance of TQM and implemented many of its basic components.” (Robbins, 2009) The above statement clearly highlights how the erroneous strategy of leading automobile manufacturing giants of USA gave room to their foreign counterparts. Even though they learned their lesson and tried to improve on their mistakes but it was too late then. The market shares that they once lost were not repairable. So was the inclusion of these counterparts in the industry. Retailers knew they had equally better options to go for and that too often at lesser costs. Product SUV’
Cite this document
(“Production and Operational Management in the auto Industry Term Paper - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/visual-arts-film-studies/37868-production-and-operational-management-in-the-auto
(Production and Operational Management in the Auto Industry Term Paper - 1)
“Production and Operational Management in the Auto Industry Term Paper - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/visual-arts-film-studies/37868-production-and-operational-management-in-the-auto.
Cited: 0 times
Topic: Production and Operational Management in the auto Industry Focusing GM vs FORD vs Foreign Auto Makers. Submitted to: Submitted by: Submitted on: 29 June 2011 Present Day US Auto Industry Termed as the Big Three, Ford, GM and Chrysler are the world renowned US auto makers that were once the sole dominating powers over the US Auto Industry…
The journey from the Stone Age to civilization was a long one and it required a combined effort from all the stakeholders. The journey, which started its process slowly eventually grabbed pace and making advancements at a rapid pace. If we examine the growth of humanity in every aspect, we will find one common feature in all of them.
The use of these innovations has made mass collection, manufacturing, generation, production, dissemination and diffusion possible (Miozzo & Soete, pp.160) minimizing the overall costs as compared to the quality and productivity of the end product. However, the technological innovations have an equally negative impact as they create a complex system dependable on modern machineries, which are human made and can go at fault any time and can put million of dollars of information or production at stake.
Many question what could have gone wrong to cause the layoffs and bankruptcies. Although there are many factors, evaluating the Auto Industry’s organizational theory can help to better understand the current situation of the Auto Industry and discuss the future.
Crude oil has to go through six phases and various stages before finally reaching the convenience stores to be used by the consumers. It takes almost 35 days for the product to reach retail markets and Marathon stores. Marathon’s crude oil supply comes from many other countries apart from United States.
Dozens of books were written to explain the main standards and practices of quality assurance in manufacturing and operations management. This paper presents a brief overview of the history of quality assurance. The definitions of quality and their implications for production and operations are provided.
Operations Management Business Plan Improvement of Business Operations. The U.S. Department of Education defines operations management as a field concerned with the management and direction of both physical and technical functions within an organisation. This is particularly true for organisations involved in production, development and manufacturing operations.
The competition is very intense and every organization has to be on its toes to keep up with the changing dynamics and the needs of the market. Traditional view of operational management was limited to manufacturing alone. Operations management was confined to activities that would involve acquiring of raw materials, converting them into finished goods and ensuring the supply of it to the end customer (Galloway, 1993).
Written questionnaires become even more cost effective as the number of research questions increases (Agus, A. 2005).
Inductive reasoning is actually a branch of logic. In a valid inductive argument, the conclusion is believed to be true on the basis of its antecedents (Joyce, Weil, 2000).
Measures of customer satisfaction and internal customer performance will also be provided. The problems associated with these measures will be discussed. The paper will also discuss aspects of Total Quality Management with respect to